Is political polarization worse than it's been in the past?
Whether political polarization is worse than in the past depends entirely on how far back you look and how polarization is measured.
If compared to the mid-to-late 20th century, the answer is a resounding yes—by nearly every metric, the country is more divided today. However, if we look at the full arc of American history, we are currently at levels of division comparable to the Reconstruction Era, though we have not yet reached the ultimate peak of polarization: the Civil War.
1. The Modern Era (The Last 50 Years): Polarization is Decidedly Worse
Political scientists generally divide polarization into two types: ideological polarization (differences in policy positions) and affective polarization (dislike and distrust of the opposing party). Both have surged dramatically in recent decades.
2. Deep History: It Has Been This Bad (and Worse) Before
While today’s polarization is unprecedented for anyone alive today, American history is filled with eras of extreme partisan rancor and institutional breakdown.
3. The Nuance: Elites vs. The General Public
Many political scientists argue that to understand modern polarization, we must distinguish between the political elites (politicians, media figures, activists) and the mass public.
A study from the University of Cambridge tracking American public opinion from 1988 to 2024 revealed that while polarization on core issues has indeed risen (particularly driven by the left shifting significantly more socially liberal over the last two decades), the average American is still far more moderate than their political leaders.
However, because the political class and media echo chambers have become so polarized, everyday citizens suffer from a misperception problem. They assume the average supporter of the opposing party holds the same extreme views as that party's most vocal, media-grabbing elites. This exaggerates the feeling of polarization, driving affective hostility even if ordinary citizens still agree on more than they realize.
Summary
Is it worse than in the past?
Citations (13)
- wikipedia.org
Backs: “Whether political polarization is worse than in the past depends entirely on how far back you look and how polarization is measured.”
- usc.edu
Backs: “If compared to the mid-to-late 20th century, the answer is a resounding yes—by nearly every metric, the country is more divided today. However, if we look at the full arc of American history, we are currently at levels of division comparable to the Reconstruction Era, though we have not yet reached the ultimate peak…”
- pewresearch.org
Backs: “If compared to the mid-to-late 20th century, the answer is a resounding yes—by nearly every metric, the country is more divided today. However, if we look at the full arc of American history, we are currently at levels of division comparable to the Reconstruction Era, though we have not yet reached the ultimate peak…”
- democracyproject.org
Backs: “However, if we look at the full arc of American history, we are currently at levels of division comparable to the Reconstruction Era, though we have not yet reached the ultimate peak of polarization: the Civil War.”
- brookings.edu
Backs: “However, if we look at the full arc of American history, we are currently at levels of division comparable to the Reconstruction Era, though we have not yet reached the ultimate peak of polarization: the Civil War.”
- wikipedia.org
Backs: “Political scientists generally divide polarization into two types: ideological polarization (differences in policy positions) and affective polarization (dislike and distrust of the opposing party). Both have surged dramatically in recent decades.”
- facinghistory.org
Backs: “The Rise of "Affective" Polarization: It is not just that Americans disagree on policies; they increasingly dislike one another. Pew Research polling shows a massive spike in partisan hostility.”
- syr.edu
Backs: “Pew Research polling shows a massive spike in partisan hostility. In 2016, 47% of Republicans and 35% of Democrats viewed the other party as "more immoral" than other Americans.”
- cam.ac.uk
Backs: “Over the last few decades, voters and politicians have "sorted" themselves. Today, ideological identity, geography, and racial/demographic identity are almost perfectly aligned with party identity, making political disputes feel existential.”
- bemidjistate.edu
Backs: “Today, ideological identity, geography, and racial/demographic identity are almost perfectly aligned with party identity, making political disputes feel existential.”
- cam.ac.uk
Backs: “A study from the University of Cambridge tracking American public opinion from 1988 to 2024 revealed that while polarization on core issues has indeed risen (particularly driven by the left shifting significantly more socially liberal over the last two decades), the average American is still far more moderate than…”
- syr.edu
Backs: “However, because the political class and media echo chambers have become so polarized, everyday citizens suffer from a misperception problem. They assume the average supporter of the opposing party holds the same extreme views as that party's most vocal, media-grabbing elites.”
- brown.edu
Backs: “The current level of partisan animosity and congressional gridlock has no modern precedent. No, if you look at the entire 250-year history of the United States.”