More answers like this
Muse Spark 1.2Nov 7, 2026meta/muse-spark-1.2-20260805

Is political polarization worse than it's been in the past?

Polarization is rising on several measures — I'll gather the latest research and historical trends to put it in context.

It depends on timeframe and how you measure it - but by most modern measures, yes, worse than the last 50-80 years, no, not worse than the most divided periods of American history.

1. By modern measures, polarization is at a 50+ year high

Scholars distinguish between ideological polarization - differences in policy positions - and affective polarization - dislike and distrust of political out-groups - both apparent in the United States.

In Congress:

A Pew Research Center analysis finds that, on average, Democrats and Republicans are farther apart ideologically today than at any time in the past 50 years.

The analysis is based on DW-NOMINATE, a method that uses lawmakers' roll-call votes to place them in a two-dimensional ideological space. DW-NOMINATE uses every roll-call vote in congressional history to place every member on a scale from roughly -1 (most liberal) to +1 (most conservative).

•Both parties have grown more ideologically cohesive. There are now only about two dozen moderate Democrats and Republicans left on Capitol Hill, versus more than 160 in 1971-72.
•Both parties have moved further away from the ideological center since the early 1970s. Democrats on average have become somewhat more liberal, while Republicans on average have become much more conservative.
•Five decades ago, there was substantial overlap; since 2002, when Republican Rep. Constance Morella of Maryland was defeated for reelection and GOP Rep. Benjamin Gilman of New York retired, there's been no overlap at all between the least liberal Democrats and least conservative Republicans in the House. In the Senate, the end of overlap came in 2004.

Studies tracing DW-NOMINATE show a U-shape: a bitterly split Gilded Age, a mid-century convergence that bottomed out in 1947, and a steep climb since the 1970s that passed the old 1895 record in 2011.

Polarization among U.S. legislators is asymmetric, as it has primarily been driven by a rightward shift among Republicans in Congress, though a 2026 Cambridge Political Psychology Lab study tracking opinion since 1988 found a different pattern among the public: the US left was 31.5% more socially liberal in 2024 compared to 1988, while the US right was only 2.8% more conservative.

Among the public (affective polarization):

According to the Pew Research Center, members of both parties who have unfavorable opinions of the opposing party doubled between 1994 and 2014.

More recent Pew data show how far this has gone: in 1994, only 17% of Republicans and 16% of Democrats held a very unfavorable view of the other party. By 2022, those figures had risen to 62% and 54%, respectively.

Divisions within the US population on social and political issues have increased by 64% since 1988, with almost all this coming after 2008, according to a study tracking polarisation from the end of the Reagan era to the dawn of Trump’s second term. The University of Cambridge’s Political Psychology Lab analysed opinions on a wide range of issues and found polarisation almost flatlined during the nineties and noughties, before rising steadily starting in 2008.

In the late 20th and early 21st century, the U.S. has experienced a greater surge in ideological polarization and affective polarization than comparable democracies.

2. By longer historical measures, not the worst ever

Historians consistently point to two periods as more polarized:

The 1850s-1860s - Civil War Era:

It has become common to say the United States is more divided today than at any other point, but as a historian who has written and taught about the Civil War era for several decades, current divisions pale in comparison to those of the mid-19th century.

Four years of civil war produced at least 620,000 military deaths – the equivalent of approximately 6.5 million dead in the United States of 2020. No political issue today approaches slavery in terms of divisiveness, and political violence included the caning of a senator on the Senate floor.

The Gilded Age (c.1870-1900):

The Gilded Age of the late 19th century is considered to be one of the most politically polarized periods in American history, with open political violence and highly polarized political discourse.

One USC analysis noted that following a period of a much more balanced Congress during the middle of the 20th century, ideological distance between the parties began to grow during the 1970s to the extent that Congress is now more polarized than at any time since the late 1870s Reconstruction Era - meaning today is the most polarized since Reconstruction, but not more polarized than the late 19th century peak.

The 1950s and 1960s were marked by high levels of political bipartisanship, the results of a post-World War II "consensus", so the current era appears especially divided compared to living memory, but that mid-century period was historically unusual for its low polarization.

3. Why the perception of "worse than ever" persists

•Sorting: Americans have sorted more cleanly into parties. The Cambridge study found that by 2024, 20% more people in the left-wing cluster now call themselves Democrats, and 51% more call themselves liberals, than in 1988.
•Debate among scholars: Not all political scientists agree the public is more ideologically divided. Despite widespread perceptions of rising political polarization, the American public is no more polarized than it was before the Reagan era, says political scientist Morris Fiorina. Fiorina argues elite polarization in Congress is wrongly imputed to the general public, while others argue mass sorting is driving elite polarization. Much of the increase is affective - they do not like members of the other party - rather than total disagreement on policy.

In short: If you mean compared to the last 50-70 years, yes - by votes in Congress, negative feelings toward the other party, and public sorting on issues, polarization is measurably worse and has surged since the 1970s, and especially since 2008. If you mean compared to all of American history, no - the fractures over slavery and the Civil War, and the partisan battles of the Gilded Age, were substantially more severe and violent.

Citations (3)

  1. 1wikipedia.orgEncyclopedias and referencequality 0.83
    Political polarization in the United States

    Backs: “It depends on timeframe and how you measure it - but by most modern measures, yes, worse than the last 50-80 years, no, not worse than the most divided periods of American history. 1. By modern measures, polarization is at a 50+ year high. Scholars distinguish between ideological polarization - differences in policy…”

  2. 2pewresearch.orgNonprofits and think tanks
    The polarization in today’s Congress has roots that go back decades

    Backs: “Scholars distinguish between ideological polarization - differences in policy positions - and affective polarization - dislike and distrust of political out-groups - both apparent in the United States. In Congress: A Pew Research Center analysis finds that, on average, Democrats and Republicans are farther apart…”

  3. 3cam.ac.ukAcademic
    Political division in the US surged from 2008 onwards

    Backs: “Polarization among U.S. legislators is asymmetric, as it has primarily been driven by a rightward shift among Republicans in Congress, though a 2026 Cambridge Political Psychology Lab study tracking opinion since 1988 found a different pattern among the public: the US left was 31.5% more socially liberal in 2024…”