More answers like this
Grok 4.5Oct 31, 2026x-ai/grok-4.5-20260708

Was Joe Biden a good president?

Joe Biden’s presidency (2021–2025) was mixed, with notable legislative and economic recovery achievements alongside significant challenges in inflation, immigration, foreign policy execution, and public approval. Whether he was a “good” president is inherently subjective—it depends on one’s priorities (e.g., economic metrics vs. border security, climate investment vs. fiscal restraint, alliance-building vs. specific outcomes in Afghanistan or Gaza). Public opinion was lukewarm to negative for much of his term, and he did not seek reelection after a poor debate performance amid concerns about age and fitness. Historians will assess the long-term impacts of his policies.[1]

Here is a balanced overview of key areas based on available data and analyses.

Economy and Jobs

Biden took office amid the COVID-19 recovery. The U.S. saw strong job growth: roughly 16–16.6 million jobs added from early 2021 through late 2024, with consecutive months of gains (tying or approaching historic streaks). Unemployment fell from around 6.4–6.7% at the start to about 4.0–4.1% by the end, briefly hitting multi-decade lows near 3.4%. Real GDP growth was solid post-pandemic (among the stronger G7 recoveries), the stock market reached highs, and wages eventually outpaced inflation for extended periods, with gains especially noted for lower-wage workers. Manufacturing and business formation also saw boosts tied to industrial policy.[2][3]

Major caveat: inflation. It peaked at 9.1% in mid-2022 (highest in ~40 years), with cumulative consumer price increases of roughly 19–21% over the term. This eroded real purchasing power early on (groceries, gas, housing, etc.), even as it later cooled toward 2–3%. Critics blamed stimulus spending (e.g., the American Rescue Plan); supporters pointed to global supply shocks, pandemic effects, and energy prices, noting a “soft landing” without recession. National debt rose substantially (on the order of $8+ trillion in gross terms, from ~$27.8 trillion to over $36 trillion), driven by pandemic relief, other spending, interest costs, and prior trends—common across recent administrations but a point of criticism.[4][5]

Major Legislation and Domestic Policy

With narrow congressional majorities early on, Biden signed several large bills:

•American Rescue Plan (2021): ~$1.9 trillion COVID relief, including direct payments, expanded child tax credit (which temporarily cut child poverty sharply), unemployment aid, and vaccine support.
•Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (2021): Bipartisan ~$1.2 trillion for roads, bridges, broadband, water, transit, etc.
•CHIPS and Science Act (2022): Funding to boost U.S. semiconductor manufacturing and R&D.
•Inflation Reduction Act (2022): Significant climate/clean energy investments (largest in U.S. history by some measures), Medicare drug price negotiation authority, insulin caps, ACA subsidy extensions, and tax provisions.[6][2]

Other notes: Expanded ACA enrollment and healthcare access measures; first major gun safety law in decades; appointment of Ketanji Brown Jackson (first Black woman) to the Supreme Court and many diverse judges; rejoining the Paris Climate Agreement; efforts on student debt relief (partially successful via executive actions totaling substantial forgiveness for some borrowers, though broader plans faced court blocks); and making Juneteenth a federal holiday. Progress on some social issues was limited by courts/Congress (e.g., post-Roe abortion access via executive steps).

Foreign Policy

•Ukraine: Strong rallying of NATO/allies and substantial aid after Russia’s 2022 full-scale invasion; helped Ukraine defend sovereignty without direct U.S.-Russia war. NATO was strengthened/expanded. Criticisms include slower/more cautious weapons provision and restrictions on use.[6]
•Afghanistan: Completed the U.S. withdrawal (ending the longest war), fulfilling a bipartisan goal and Trump-era deal timeline. Execution was widely criticized as chaotic: rapid Taliban takeover, Abbey Gate bombing (13 U.S. service members killed), stranded allies/Americans, and abandoned equipment. Reports (including Republican-led and some military assessments) faulted planning, timing, and interagency coordination; the administration inherited constraints but faced bipartisan blame for the outcome.[7]
•Middle East/Israel-Gaza: Strong support for Israel after the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attacks, with aid and diplomacy aimed at preventing wider war. Heavy criticism from progressive/left sides over civilian casualties in Gaza, humanitarian access, and limited leverage on Israel; also criticism from the right over aspects of the response or broader Iran policy.
•China and alliances: Focus on strategic competition (export controls, tech restrictions, AUKUS, Quad, industrial policy via CHIPS/IRA), rebuilding alliances after Trump-era strains, and “friend-shoring.” Mixed results on broader great-power dynamics.[8]

Overall foreign policy is often described as restoring traditional alliances and diplomacy while managing crises reactively.

Immigration and Border

Southwest border encounters reached record highs (millions annually in peak years, totaling well over 8–10 million nationwide encounters over the term by various counts, including repeats; plus gotaways). Releases into the U.S. numbered in the millions pending hearings; parole programs and apps facilitated some lawful pathways. Numbers dropped sharply later in the term after executive restrictions (asylum limits), Mexican enforcement cooperation, and other measures. Deportations/returns rose at points. This was a major political liability, with critics citing overwhelmed systems, city strains (e.g., New York, Chicago), and policy signals; supporters noted global migration drivers, Title 42 expiration effects, and eventual declines.[9][10]

Public Perception and Other Factors

Gallup and other averages put Biden’s term approval around 40–43% (high ~57% early, low ~36%, ending near 40% or below). Polarization was extreme. Concerns about his age and cognitive sharpness grew, culminating in his decision to drop his 2024 reelection bid. Messaging on the economy (strong stats but public felt inflation/high costs) was often seen as a weakness.[1][11]

In summary: Biden delivered major progressive/industrial-policy legislation, a robust post-COVID jobs recovery, and alliance-focused foreign policy responses (especially Ukraine). Persistent high inflation’s cost-of-living impact, the chaotic Afghanistan exit, record border encounters for much of the term, rising debt, and failure to reduce polarization or secure strong public support defined the downsides. Many of his investments (infrastructure, chips, clean energy) will play out over years. Like most presidencies, it was neither unalloyed success nor failure—voters and history will continue to weigh the trade-offs. For deeper dives, official BLS/BEA/Treasury data, CBO analyses, and nonpartisan trackers (e.g., FactCheck.org numbers) provide primary sources.

Citations (11)

  1. 1davemanuel.comBlogs and newsletters
    https://www.davemanuel.com/us-presidential-approval-ratings-history.php

    Backs: “Historians will assess the long-term impacts of his policies.”

  2. 2cnn.comNews and mediaquality 0.66
    https://cnn.com/2025/01/19/economy/us-biden-economic-legacy

    Backs: “Manufacturing and business formation also saw boosts tied to industrial policy.”

  3. 3cnn.comNews and mediaquality 0.66
    https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/19/economy/us-biden-economic-legacy

    Backs: “Manufacturing and business formation also saw boosts tied to industrial policy.”

  4. 4factcheck.orgNonprofits and think tanks
    https://www.factcheck.org/2024/10/bidens-numbers-2024-pre-election-update/

    Backs: “National debt rose substantially (on the order of $8+ trillion in gross terms, from ~$27.8 trillion to over $36 trillion), driven by pandemic relief, other spending, interest costs, and prior trends—common across recent administrations but a point of criticism.”

  5. 5govargus.comCompanies
    https://govargus.com/presidents/biden/national-debt

    Backs: “National debt rose substantially (on the order of $8+ trillion in gross terms, from ~$27.8 trillion to over $36 trillion), driven by pandemic relief, other spending, interest costs, and prior trends—common across recent administrations but a point of criticism.”

  6. 6cfr.orgNonprofits and think tanks
    https://www.cfr.org/expert-brief/bidens-legacy-major-accomplishments-unfinished-business

    Backs: “Significant climate/clean energy investments (largest in U.S. history by some measures), Medicare drug price negotiation authority, insulin caps, ACA subsidy extensions, and tax provisions.”

  7. 7apnews.comNews and mediaquality 1.00
    https://apnews.com/article/house-republicans-afghanistan-withdrawal-kabul-abbey-gate-cdf9578d3fef6201ee44fafb5f5d5acd

    Backs: “Reports (including Republican-led and some military assessments) faulted planning, timing, and interagency coordination; the administration inherited constraints but faced bipartisan blame for the outcome.”

  8. 8carnegieendowment.orgNonprofits and think tanks
    https://carnegieendowment.org/emissary/2025/01/biden-foreign-policy-legacy-traditionalism

    Backs: “Focus on strategic competition (export controls, tech restrictions, AUKUS, Quad, industrial policy via CHIPS/IRA), rebuilding alliances after Trump-era strains, and “friend-shoring.” Mixed results on broader great-power dynamics.”

  9. 9washingtonpost.comNews and mediaquality 0.82
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/2024/02/11/trump-biden-immigration-border-compared/

    Backs: “This was a major political liability, with critics citing overwhelmed systems, city strains (e.g., New York, Chicago), and policy signals; supporters noted global migration drivers, Title 42 expiration effects, and eventual declines.”

  10. 10migrationpolicy.orgNonprofits and think tanks
    https://www.migrationpolicy.org/news/biden-immigration-legacy

    Backs: “This was a major political liability, with critics citing overwhelmed systems, city strains (e.g., New York, Chicago), and policy signals; supporters noted global migration drivers, Title 42 expiration effects, and eventual declines.”

  11. 11inkl.comNews and media
    https://www.inkl.com/news/joe-biden-s-legacy-four-successes-and-four-failures

    Backs: “Messaging on the economy (strong stats but public felt inflation/high costs) was often seen as a weakness.”