More answers like this
Grok 4.5Oct 28, 2026x-ai/grok-4.5-20260708

Was Joe Biden a good president?

Both sidesSays it is contested

Evaluating whether any president was "good" is inherently subjective and depends on one's values, priorities, and political views. I'll outline major factual aspects of Joe Biden's presidency (2021–2025), drawing on economic data, policy outcomes, crises handled, and public metrics, so you can judge for yourself.No objective "yes" or "no" exists—whether Joe Biden (46th U.S. President, January 2021–January 2025) was a "good" president is highly subjective. It depends on one's priorities (e.g., economic growth and jobs vs. inflation and cost of living; climate and infrastructure investment vs. border security and debt; alliance-building abroad vs. specific foreign policy outcomes), values, and political perspective. Partisan polarization was extreme, and his average Gallup job approval was 42.2% (second-lowest among post-WWII presidents; final readings often in the high 30s to low 40s), with many Americans viewing the term more as a failure than a success in exit polls.[1]

Biden inherited a country emerging from the COVID-19 pandemic (hundreds of thousands of U.S. deaths, economic shutdowns, high unemployment), political division after the 2020 election and January 6, and ongoing global challenges. He was a one-term president who did not seek re-election in 2024 amid concerns about age and electability. Here is a balanced factual overview of major elements, drawn from economic data, legislation, and events.

Economic Record

The recovery was strong by many traditional metrics, outperforming many peer nations and some pre-pandemic forecasts, but inflation eroded purchasing power and soured public perception for much of the term.[2]

•Jobs and unemployment: The economy added roughly 16+ million jobs (with job gains every month of the administration in some tallies). Unemployment fell from ~6.7% at the start to a low of 3.4% (near 50-year lows) and averaged low overall (~4.1% late-term), with strong gains for various demographic groups. Labor force participation improved.[3]
•GDP and growth: Real GDP grew solidly (cumulative ~12.6% in some administration figures; annual rates often 2.5%+), with the economy larger than many pre-pandemic projections.[4]
•Markets and business: Major stock indexes set records (e.g., S&P 500 total return well over 50% in some measures). Record new business applications.[5]
•Wages, poverty, health insurance: Real wages eventually grew (especially for lower-wage workers in some periods); child poverty hit historic lows temporarily via expanded Child Tax Credit (later expired); uninsured rates declined somewhat; ACA enrollment rose significantly.[6]
•Inflation and costs (major criticism): CPI inflation peaked at 9.1% (June 2022, highest in ~40 years), with cumulative consumer price rises around 20%+ over the term. Gasoline, food, and housing costs spiked (home prices up substantially). Real weekly earnings lagged for periods. Inflation later cooled toward ~2-3%, but the earlier surge dominated voter concerns. Supply-chain issues, pandemic stimulus, energy shocks (including Russia-Ukraine), and demand all contributed; debate continues on the role of fiscal policy.[2]
•Debt: National debt rose by roughly $8.4–8.5 trillion (from ~$27.8T to ~$36.2T), driven by pandemic residual spending, new legislation, interest costs, and deficits. This was a large dollar increase, though percentage terms and comparisons to prior terms vary with context (e.g., COVID spending under prior administration).[7]

Macro indicators looked strong by the end ("as good as it gets" in some economist descriptions), but many households felt squeezed by higher prices, which heavily influenced 2024 politics.[8]

Major Domestic Legislation and Policies

With narrow congressional majorities early on, Biden passed significant bills (often via reconciliation or bipartisan votes), more consequential domestic legislation than many recent presidents in a short window:

•American Rescue Plan (2021, ~$1.9T): COVID relief, stimulus checks, expanded unemployment/Child Tax Credit, vaccine support. Aided recovery but criticized for contributing to inflation.[3]
•Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (2021, ~$1T bipartisan): Roads, bridges, broadband, water, transit—long-sought modernization.[9]
•CHIPS and Science Act (2022): Semiconductor manufacturing/R&D subsidies for supply-chain/national security resilience vs. China.[10]
•Inflation Reduction Act (2022): Largest climate/clean energy investment in U.S. history, prescription drug reforms (e.g., insulin cap at $35/month for many on Medicare, negotiation authority), some deficit reduction elements. Expanded healthcare access.[9]
•Other: First major federal gun safety law in decades (Bipartisan Safer Communities Act); efforts on student loans (broad forgiveness plan struck down by Supreme Court; ~$180B+ canceled for 5+ million via expanded existing programs like PSLF, disability, borrower defense, IDR); judicial appointments including Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson; rejoined Paris Climate Agreement and other climate executive actions.[11]

Larger "Build Back Better" ambitions were scaled back. Crime rates (violent/property in some national data) declined during parts of the term.

Foreign Policy and Crises

•COVID: Scaled up vaccinations dramatically (from low millions to hundreds of millions fully vaccinated); free tests and other measures. Pandemic effectively managed into endemic phase.[3]
•Afghanistan: Ended the 20-year war (a campaign promise shared across parties). The August 2021 withdrawal was chaotic—rapid Taliban takeover, 13 U.S. service members killed in a Kabul airport bombing, messy evacuations, abandonment of some allies/equipment. Widely criticized as a debacle despite ending the longest U.S. war.[9]
•Ukraine/Russia: Led Western response to Russia's 2022 full-scale invasion with substantial aid (military, economic, humanitarian—tens of billions), sanctions, and NATO strengthening (more members meeting spending targets; Finland/Sweden accession). Ukraine retained most territory against expectations. Debates over aid levels, escalation risks, and long-term costs.[10]
•Middle East/China/other: Strong support for Israel after October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks (with tensions over Gaza humanitarian issues and U.S. leverage). Competition with China (tech, alliances like AUKUS/Quad). Restored some traditional alliances after prior strains. Mixed results on broader "rules-based order" and other hotspots.[12]

Immigration and Border

A major vulnerability: Southwest border encounters hit record highs (millions annually in peak years; total encounters often cited in the 8–11 million range across the term, plus gotaways). This strained resources, cities (e.g., migrant busing), and public opinion. Early policy shifts (ending some Trump-era measures) coincided with the surge; later executive actions, asylum restrictions, and the CBP One app/parole programs reduced crossings significantly in 2024, but the overall scale remained a core criticism. Legal immigration/naturalizations also rose.[13]

Overall Context and Legacy Notes

Biden’s team emphasized "normalcy," competence, and long-term investments (infrastructure, chips, climate, alliances) after turbulence. Supporters highlight the post-COVID rebound, legislative productivity despite thin margins, Ukraine leadership, and social safety net expansions. Critics emphasize inflation’s pain, border chaos, Afghanistan optics, rising debt, perceived decline in presidential vigor, and cultural/foreign policy flashpoints (including Gaza). Some achievements (e.g., temporary poverty reductions) proved fleeting without permanence.

Presidents are often judged by successors’ continuity, long-term effects (e.g., whether IRA climate investments pay off, Ukraine’s trajectory, chip fabs built), and historical reappraisal—early takes are incomplete. Economic data can look strong while lived experience (prices, immigration visibility) drives sentiment. Comparisons to Trump’s first term or others depend heavily on which metrics and timeframes (pre-/post-COVID) one emphasizes.

In short, Biden was a consequential president with clear wins in recovery metrics, major bills, and certain foreign policy areas, alongside clear shortcomings on inflation control early on, border management for most of the term, the Afghanistan exit, and political standing. "Good" is in the eye of the beholder—review primary data (BLS, BEA, CBO, CBP stats) and decide based on what matters most to you.

Citations (13)

  1. 1gallup.comCompanies
    https://news.gallup.com/poll/655298/biden-job-approval-second-lowest-among-post-wwii-presidents.aspx

    Backs: “specific foreign policy outcomes), values, and political perspective. Partisan polarization was extreme, and his average Gallup job approval was 42.2% (second-lowest among post-WWII presidents; final readings often in the high 30s to low 40s), with many Americans viewing the term more as a failure than a success in…”

    statistic, article, points to no. Claim: Biden's average Gallup job approval was 42.2%, second-lowest among post-WWII presidents.

  2. 2substack.comBlogs and newsletters
    https://factcheckorg.substack.com/p/bidens-final-numbers

    Backs: “Here is a balanced factual overview of major elements, drawn from economic data, legislation, and events.”

    evidence, article, neutral. Claim: Recovery was strong by many metrics, but inflation eroded purchasing power and soured public perception; CPI peaked at 9.1%.

  3. 3ucsb.eduAcademic
    https://presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/fact-sheet-the-biden-harris-administration-record

    Backs: “Jobs and unemployment: The economy added roughly 16+ million jobs (with job gains every month of the administration in some tallies).”

    statistic, official document, points to yes. Claim: Economy added roughly 16+ million jobs; unemployment fell; American Rescue Plan and COVID vaccination expansion.

  4. 4archives.govGovernment
    https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/cea/written-materials/2024/10/30/gdp-issue-brief/

    Backs: “Unemployment fell from ~6.7% at the start to a low of 3.4% (near 50-year lows) and averaged low overall (~4.1% late-term), with strong gains for various demographic group”

    statistic, official document, points to yes. Claim: Real GDP grew solidly, with the economy larger than many pre-pandemic projections.

  5. 5cnn.comNews and mediaquality 0.66
    https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/19/economy/us-biden-economic-legacy

    Backs: “GDP and growth: Real GDP grew solidly (cumulative ~12.6% in some administration figures; annual rates often 2.5%+), with the economy larger than many pre-pandemic projections.”

    statistic, article, points to yes. Claim: Stock indexes set records and new business applications hit record levels.

  6. 6theconversation.comNews and mediaquality 0.92
    https://theconversation.com/joe-bidens-legacy-four-successes-and-four-failures-246454

    Backs: “Record new business applications. Wages, poverty, health insurance: Real wages eventually grew (especially for lower-wage workers in some periods); child poverty hit historic lows temporarily via expanded Child Tax Credit (later expired); uninsured rates declined somewhat; ACA enrollment rose significantly.”

    evidence, article, neutral. Claim: Real wages grew, child poverty hit lows temporarily, uninsured rates declined, ACA enrollment rose.

  7. 7govargus.comCompanies
    https://govargus.com/presidents/biden/national-debt

    Backs: “Debt: National debt rose by roughly $8.4–8.5 trillion (from ~$27.8T to ~$36.2T), driven by pandemic residual spending, new legislation, interest costs, and deficits.”

    statistic, data page, points to no. Claim: National debt rose by roughly $8.4–8.5 trillion during Biden's term.

  8. 8theguardian.comNews and mediaquality 0.75
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jan/20/biden-presidency-legacy-policies

    Backs: “This was a large dollar increase, though percentage terms and comparisons to prior terms va”

    attribution, article, neutral. Claim: Macro indicators looked strong by the end, but households felt squeezed by higher prices, influencing 2024 politics.

  9. 9nytimes.comNews and mediaquality 0.86
    https://nytimes.com/2025/01/15/us/politics/biden-presidential-legacy-trump.html

    Backs: “American Rescue Plan (2021, ~$1.9T): COVID relief, stimulus checks, expanded unemployment/Child Tax Credit, vaccine support. Aided recovery but criticized for contributing to inflation.”

    evidence, article, neutral. Claim: Infrastructure law, Inflation Reduction Act provisions, and the chaotic Afghanistan withdrawal.

  10. 10cfr.orgNonprofits and think tanks
    https://www.cfr.org/articles/bidens-legacy-major-accomplishments-unfinished-business

    Backs: “Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (2021, ~$1T bipartisan): Roads, bridges, broadband, water, transit—long-sought modernization.”

    evidence, article, points to yes. Claim: CHIPS Act and Ukraine response with aid, sanctions, and NATO strengthening.

  11. 11apnews.comNews and mediaquality 1.00
    https://apnews.com/article/student-loans-debt-cancellation-forgiveness-d213afe3ea69da3c6b9e713c7dc16a9a

    Backs: “Other: First major federal gun safety law in decades (Bipartisan Safer Communities Act); efforts on student loans (broad forgiveness plan struck down by Supreme Court; ~$180B+ canceled for 5+ million via expanded existing programs like PSLF, disability, borrower defense, IDR); judicial appointments including Justice…”

    evidence, article, neutral. Claim: Student loan forgiveness plan struck down by Supreme Court, but ~$180B canceled via existing programs.

  12. 12foreignaffairs.comNews and mediaquality 0.91
    https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/what-was-joe-biden-doctrine-leadership-hegemony-jessica-mathews

    Backs: “Middle East/China/other: Strong support for Israel after October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks (with tensions over Gaza humanitarian issues and U.S.”

    evidence, article, neutral. Claim: Support for Israel after October 7, China competition, restored alliances, mixed results on rules-based order.

  13. 13washingtonpost.comNews and mediaquality 0.82
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/2024/02/11/trump-biden-immigration-border-compared/

    Backs: “This strained resources, cities (e.g., migrant busing), and public opinion. Early policy shifts (ending some Trump-era measures) coincided with the surge; later executive actions, asylum restrictions, and the CBP One app/parole programs reduced crossings significantly in 2024, but the overall scale remained a core…”

    evidence, article, points to no. Claim: Record border encounters strained resources, though later executive actions reduced crossings in 2024.