More answers like this
Muse Spark 1.2Oct 27, 2026meta/muse-spark-1.2-20260805

Will stopping immigration cause labor shortages?

YesSays it is contested

Will halting immigration tighten labor markets? I'll pull the latest data on workforce gaps.

Yes, according to most economic research, stopping immigration would cause - and is already causing - labor shortages, particularly in the United States.

Demographics: Without immigration the workforce shrinks

> "without the immigration surge of 2022 to 2024, the US working-age population would have been shrinking. ... The prime-age labor force grew in large part because of immigration"

Research from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco found:

> "without new immigration, the U.S. working-age population ages 16 to 64 would have started to decline in 2012"

And:

> "The Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco found that without immigration, the U.S. working-age population would have started shrinking in 2012, not 2025"

Current trends show the problem accelerating:

> "net migration will be close to half a million people in 2025, down from 2.2 million in 2024"

Estimates suggest that even that level is "below the level of net migration necessary to sustain positive growth in the working-age population".

Pew Research projected that "Without them, the number of working-age Americans would drop to 166 million by 2035".

The Indeed Hiring Lab summarized the demographic reality:

> "The United States is aging, and immigrants, on average, are more likely to be of prime working age than native-born Americans"

> "Put simply, immigration will soon become the primary mechanism keeping the population and the labor force growing. Without it, the U.S. will not just be facing a tighter labor market, but a shrinking one."

San Francisco Fed projections show that without immigration, "prime-age labor force growth will likely continue to slow and turn negative around 2042".

Sectors most affected

Immigrants are disproportionately concentrated in sectors with chronic shortages:

> "Foreign-born workers accounted for about a fifth of the US labor market in 2024" and "were more likely than native-born workers to be employed in service occupations, natural resources, construction and maintenance, and production, transportation, and logistics. These are sectors with chronic labor shortages and limited domestic supply pipelines"

Specific concentrations:

•Immigrants made up 35% of the construction trades workforce in 2024 though they were only 18% of the labor force
•Other highly dependent sectors include:
•Agriculture: Heavily dependent on immigrant seasonal and migrant labor
•Construction: Immigrants make up a large share of the workforce
•Healthcare: Particularly in eldercare and nursing support

Measured economic consequences

Studies of the recent slowdown already show effects:

•A Brookings Institution analysis found Trump's immigration crackdown resulted in "668,000 jobs lost, an estimated 51,000-297,000 would have been held by American-born workers" with "Losses concentrated in immigrant-intensive sectors but spread well beyond them. The deepest direct hits fell on construction and on accommodation and food services"
•Brookings models say a plunge in immigration will "dampen employment, GDP, and consumer spending and push sustainable monthly job growth well below historical norms—perhaps to 20,000–50,000 or even negative territory in 2026"
•The CBO projects that reduced immigration will "shrink the labor force by 15 million jobs by 2035"

Nuance and counter-arguments

Not all effects are purely supply-side. Economists note that reduced immigration also reduces demand for goods and services, so they "expect negative immigration to have little impact on prices and inflation because businesses will experience reductions in both labor supply and demand".

In the very long term, some analysts argue "telehealth and AI diagnostics may offset labor shortages", and higher wages or automation could attract more native-born workers or increase productivity. However, most labor economists conclude that due to aging (all baby boomers will be over 65 by end of decade) and low native birth rates, there is no domestic pipeline to replace immigrant workers within 5-10 years without significant immigration.

Citations (3)

  1. 1frbsf.orgGovernment
    Immigration and Changes in Labor Force Demographics

    Backs: “The prime-age labor force grew in large part because of immigration". Research from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco found: "without new immigration, the U.S.”

    evidence, article, points to yes. Claim: Without immigration, the US working-age population would have started declining in 2012, and prime-age labor force growth would turn negative around 2042 (SF Fed research).

  2. 2inc.comNews and mediaquality 0.88
    Trump’s Immigration Crackdown Has Cost the U.S. Economy 668,000 Jobs, Studies Show

    Backs: “Pew Research projected that "Without them, the number of working-age Americans would drop to 166 million by 2035". The Indeed Hiring Lab summarized the demographic reality: "The United States is aging, and immigrants, on average, are more likely to be of prime working age than native-born Americans"”

    statistic, article, points to yes. Claim: Immigration crackdown cost 668,000 jobs; Pew projects working-age Americans dropping to 166 million by 2035; Indeed says immigration will keep the labor force growing.

  3. Job market faces ‘macroeconomic consequences’ if immigration slows: report

    Backs: “Sectors most affected. Immigrants are disproportionately concentrated in sectors with chronic shortages:”

    evidence, article, points to yes. Claim: Immigrants are concentrated in sectors with chronic labor shortages, so slowed immigration has macroeconomic consequences for the job market.