More answers like this
Grok 4.5Oct 4, 2026x-ai/grok-4.5-20260708

Was Joe Biden a good president?

No, there is no objective yes/no answer—whether Joe Biden was a “good” president is inherently subjective. It depends on one’s priorities (e.g., economic recovery and climate action vs. inflation control and border security), values, and how one weighs short-term pain against longer-term investments. Historians will debate his legacy for decades; public opinion during and at the end of his term (2021–2025) was polarized and generally low.[1]

Biden entered office amid the COVID-19 pandemic, with the economy reeling, and left as a one-term president who withdrew from seeking reelection in 2024 amid concerns about his age and a poor debate performance. His administration passed major legislation early on with thin Democratic majorities (and some bipartisan support), oversaw a strong jobs recovery, and pursued climate and industrial policy, but faced high inflation, record migrant encounters at the southern border, a chaotic Afghanistan withdrawal, and persistently low approval ratings.

Key Achievements

Supporters highlight a consequential domestic agenda and post-pandemic recovery:

•COVID response and economic recovery: The $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan provided stimulus, aided vaccine distribution, and supported households/businesses. Vaccination rates rose dramatically. The economy added roughly 15–16.6 million jobs; unemployment fell to historic lows (lowest average in ~50 years, with record lows for Black Americans, Latinos, women, and others); and the U.S. achieved a “soft landing” with strong GDP growth outperforming many peers. It was the only administration to add jobs every month. Real wages eventually rose for many (especially lower-wage workers later in the term), household wealth increased, and manufacturing/semiconductor investment grew via the CHIPS and Science Act.[2]
•Infrastructure and climate: The bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (~$1–1.2 trillion) funded roads, bridges, broadband, water systems, and more—long-sought investments. The Inflation Reduction Act represented the largest U.S. climate/clean energy investment in history (hundreds of billions for EVs, renewables, efficiency), alongside healthcare measures like Medicare drug price negotiation and insulin caps. The U.S. rejoined the Paris Agreement.[3]
•Other domestic wins: Partial student debt relief (tens of billions for millions despite court setbacks), expanded ACA enrollment (record low uninsured rates), a bipartisan gun safety law (first major one in decades), and judicial appointments.
•Foreign policy: Ended the U.S. combat role in Afghanistan (America’s longest war). Strong support for Ukraine against Russia’s invasion, which helped rally and expand NATO. Emphasis on alliances and industrial policy (e.g., countering China on chips).

These are often cited as among the most significant legislative outputs since the Great Society or New Deal eras in certain areas, especially given divided government later.[4]

Major Criticisms and Shortcomings

Critics point to high costs of living, border issues, execution failures, and leadership concerns:

•Inflation: The defining economic challenge. CPI inflation peaked at 9.1% in mid-2022 (highest in ~40 years) and rose cumulatively ~19–21% over the term (groceries ~22%, energy/gas significantly higher at peaks). While global factors (pandemic supply chains, Russia-Ukraine war energy shock) and prior stimulus played major roles—and inflation later cooled to ~2.5–3% by late 2024/early 2025—real wages lagged for much of the period for many households, fueling public discontent. The American Rescue Plan is debated as contributing to excess demand.[5]
•Immigration/border: Encounters at the U.S.-Mexico border hit record levels (often 1.5–2+ million annually in peak years FY2021–2023; totals in the multi-millions including gotaways and releases into the U.S.). This strained cities and resources. Numbers fell sharply later after policy tightenings (asylum restrictions) and Mexican cooperation, but the early surge and overall totals were a major liability. Deportations/returns increased later.[6]
•Afghanistan withdrawal (2021): Ending the war fulfilled a bipartisan goal and Trump-era deal timeline, but the execution was chaotic—rapid Taliban takeover, evacuation disorder at Kabul airport, 13 U.S. service members killed in a bombing, stranded allies, and abandoned equipment. Intelligence underestimated the speed of collapse; planning for worst-case scenarios drew heavy bipartisan criticism.[7]
•Other issues: Age and fitness questions dominated the end of his term. Some progressive priorities (e.g., codifying abortion rights post-Roe, comprehensive immigration/voting rights bills) stalled. Foreign policy drew fire over Gaza (support for Israel amid high civilian casualties) and other areas. Crime trends improved after 2020 spikes in some metrics, but perceptions varied.

Public Opinion and Context

Gallup and other polls showed average job approval around 42% (second-lowest post-WWII after Trump’s first term in some measures), starting higher (~50s) and settling in the high 30s to low 40s, with final readings near 37–40%. It was extremely polarized (high Democratic support, very low Republican). Inflation, border, and age were top voter concerns in 2024.[1]

Presidents inherit conditions and face constraints (Congress, Fed, global events, courts). Biden’s early legislative productivity was notable; the recovery was robust by many metrics (jobs, growth, avoiding recession); yet cumulative price increases and visible disorder on the border eroded trust for a large share of the public. Long-term effects of infrastructure, climate investments, chips manufacturing, and Ukraine aid will take years to fully assess.

In short, Biden delivered major policy wins and a strong rebound from crisis for supporters of activist government and green industrial policy. For those prioritizing price stability, border control, or vigorous executive presence, the record looks weaker or unsuccessful. Reasonable people can (and do) disagree based on the same facts. For primary sources, check BLS/BEA economic data, CBP border stats, congressional records on legislation, and Gallup/Pew polling archives.

Citations (7)

  1. 1gallup.comCompanies
    https://news.gallup.com/poll/655298/biden-job-approval-second-lowest-among-post-wwii-presidents.aspx

    Backs: “Historians will debate his legacy for decades; public opinion during and at the end of his term (2021–2025) was polarized and generally low.”

  2. 2ucsb.eduAcademic
    https://presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/fact-sheet-the-biden-harris-administration-record

    Backs: “Real wages eventually rose for many (especially lower-wage workers later in the term), household wealth increased, and manufacturing/semiconductor investment grew via the CHIPS and Science Act.”

  3. 3nytimes.comNews and mediaquality 0.86
    https://nytimes.com/2025/01/15/us/politics/biden-presidential-legacy-trump.html

    Backs: “The Inflation Reduction Act represented the largest U.S. climate/clean energy investment in history (hundreds of billions for EVs, renewables, efficiency), alongside healthcare measures like Medicare drug price negotiation and insulin caps. The U.S. rejoined the Paris Agreement.”

  4. 4theguardian.comNews and mediaquality 0.75
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jan/20/biden-presidency-legacy-policies

    Backs: “These are often cited as among the most significant legislative outputs since the Great Society or New Deal eras in certain areas, especially given divided government later.”

  5. 5washingtonexaminer.comNews and mediaquality 0.51
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/3184998/final-preelection-inflation-tally-how-much-prices-risen-biden/

    Backs: “The American Rescue Plan is debated as contributing to excess demand.”

  6. 6washingtonpost.comNews and mediaquality 0.82
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/2024/02/11/trump-biden-immigration-border-compared/

    Backs: “Numbers fell sharply later after policy tightenings (asylum restrictions) and Mexican cooperation, but the early surge and overall totals were a major liability. Deportations/returns increased later.”

  7. 7house.govGovernment
    https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/getting-answers-on-afghanistan-withdrawal

    Backs: “Intelligence underestimated the speed of collapse; planning for worst-case scenarios drew heavy bipartisan criticism.”