Was Joe Biden a good president?
No, there is no objective yes/no answer—whether Joe Biden was a “good” president is inherently subjective. It depends on one’s priorities (e.g., economic recovery and climate action vs. inflation control and border security), values, and how one weighs short-term pain against longer-term investments. Historians will debate his legacy for decades; public opinion during and at the end of his term (2021–2025) was polarized and generally low.[1]
Biden entered office amid the COVID-19 pandemic, with the economy reeling, and left as a one-term president who withdrew from seeking reelection in 2024 amid concerns about his age and a poor debate performance. His administration passed major legislation early on with thin Democratic majorities (and some bipartisan support), oversaw a strong jobs recovery, and pursued climate and industrial policy, but faced high inflation, record migrant encounters at the southern border, a chaotic Afghanistan withdrawal, and persistently low approval ratings.
Key Achievements
Supporters highlight a consequential domestic agenda and post-pandemic recovery:
These are often cited as among the most significant legislative outputs since the Great Society or New Deal eras in certain areas, especially given divided government later.[4]
Major Criticisms and Shortcomings
Critics point to high costs of living, border issues, execution failures, and leadership concerns:
Public Opinion and Context
Gallup and other polls showed average job approval around 42% (second-lowest post-WWII after Trump’s first term in some measures), starting higher (~50s) and settling in the high 30s to low 40s, with final readings near 37–40%. It was extremely polarized (high Democratic support, very low Republican). Inflation, border, and age were top voter concerns in 2024.[1]
Presidents inherit conditions and face constraints (Congress, Fed, global events, courts). Biden’s early legislative productivity was notable; the recovery was robust by many metrics (jobs, growth, avoiding recession); yet cumulative price increases and visible disorder on the border eroded trust for a large share of the public. Long-term effects of infrastructure, climate investments, chips manufacturing, and Ukraine aid will take years to fully assess.
In short, Biden delivered major policy wins and a strong rebound from crisis for supporters of activist government and green industrial policy. For those prioritizing price stability, border control, or vigorous executive presence, the record looks weaker or unsuccessful. Reasonable people can (and do) disagree based on the same facts. For primary sources, check BLS/BEA economic data, CBP border stats, congressional records on legislation, and Gallup/Pew polling archives.
Citations (7)
- https://news.gallup.com/poll/655298/biden-job-approval-second-lowest-among-post-wwii-presidents.aspx
Backs: “Historians will debate his legacy for decades; public opinion during and at the end of his term (2021–2025) was polarized and generally low.”
- https://presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/fact-sheet-the-biden-harris-administration-record
Backs: “Real wages eventually rose for many (especially lower-wage workers later in the term), household wealth increased, and manufacturing/semiconductor investment grew via the CHIPS and Science Act.”
- https://nytimes.com/2025/01/15/us/politics/biden-presidential-legacy-trump.html
Backs: “The Inflation Reduction Act represented the largest U.S. climate/clean energy investment in history (hundreds of billions for EVs, renewables, efficiency), alongside healthcare measures like Medicare drug price negotiation and insulin caps. The U.S. rejoined the Paris Agreement.”
- https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jan/20/biden-presidency-legacy-policies
Backs: “These are often cited as among the most significant legislative outputs since the Great Society or New Deal eras in certain areas, especially given divided government later.”
- https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/3184998/final-preelection-inflation-tally-how-much-prices-risen-biden/
Backs: “The American Rescue Plan is debated as contributing to excess demand.”
- https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/2024/02/11/trump-biden-immigration-border-compared/
Backs: “Numbers fell sharply later after policy tightenings (asylum restrictions) and Mexican cooperation, but the early surge and overall totals were a major liability. Deportations/returns increased later.”
- https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/getting-answers-on-afghanistan-withdrawal
Backs: “Intelligence underestimated the speed of collapse; planning for worst-case scenarios drew heavy bipartisan criticism.”