More answers like this
Muse Spark 1.2Oct 1, 2026meta/muse-spark-1.2-20260805

Will stopping immigration cause labor shortages?

Stopping immigration would reshape the labor market - I'll pull current research on whether it triggers shortages.

Yes, according to most economic and demographic research - stopping immigration would cause labor shortages, particularly in the United States and other aging, low-birth-rate economies.

The short answer is that immigration has become the primary source of labor force growth, and without it the workforce would already be shrinking.

1. Labor force growth is now almost entirely immigration-driven

•In 2023, immigrants constituted 18.6% of the U.S. civilian labor force
•88% of America's labor force growth since 2019 came from immigrants. Remove immigration, and America's labor force would have shrunk by 1.3 million workers between 2018 and 2024
•Immigrants made up 84.7% of labor force growth since 2019 according to another estimate
•Without immigration, the U.S. population would shrink. This would cause a corresponding decrease in both the labor force and overall economic activity

Demographers stress this is a structural issue, not cyclical:

•The Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco found that without immigration, the U.S. working-age population would have started shrinking in 2012, not 2025
•Recent research from Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco found the working-age population would have likely started shrinking over a decade ago if not for immigration
•The immigration slowdown is restricting what economists say is a main avenue for growth of the labor force, with birth rates at a record low and more baby boomers reaching retirement age

> “The implication for the labor market is direct: without the immigration surge of 2022 to 2024, the US working-age population would have been shrinking."

2. What studies project if immigration is stopped or sharply reduced

Different models project different magnitudes, but all point to contraction:

•Immigration restrictions may reduce the U.S. labor force by 2.1 million people - a combined total reduction of approximately 2.1 million workers, almost 1.3% of the labor supply
•Over the next decade, the U.S. population is forecast to grow an average 0.3% each year... That equates to a downward revision of 2.4 million fewer working-age Americans by 2035
•The CBO forecasts reduced net immigration will lead to 5.3 million fewer people living in the U.S. a decade from now
•By 2028, the projected workforce could be reduced by 6.8 million workers—2.8 million due to changes in legal immigration, 4 million from illegal immigration enforcement. By 2035, that number could reach 15.7 million fewer workers
•Brooking's modelling of a low-immigration Trump scenario vs high-immigration Harris scenario found GDP growth in 2025 to be roughly half a percentage point—or $130 billion—lower

A sudden plunge in immigration reduces the labor force available to fill jobs ... which Brookings models say will dampen employment, GDP, and consumer spending and push sustainable monthly job growth well below historical norms

The U.S. economy lost 23,000 jobs in July as roughly 200,000 immigrants lost temporary protected status, driving the first clear deportation-related labor shock

3. Which sectors would face shortages first

Tightened immigration controls are directly linked to growing labor shortages in key sectors of the U.S. economy

Labor shortages are growing in sectors that rely heavily on immigrant workers, including agriculture, construction, food service, healthcare, and transportation

Immigrant share by sector is high:

•With immigrant workers comprising 25% of construction labor, 66% of agriculture workers, and 15–28% of healthcare staff
•Immigrants made up 24% of workers in residential care settings such as assisted living, 21% of workers in nursing facilities, and 32% to 40% of workers in home care in 2023

The Trump administration itself admitted in an Oct. 2 Federal Register filing: "The near total cessation of the inflow of illegal aliens combined with the lack of an available legal workforce... results in significant disruptions to production costs and (threatens) the stability of domestic food production and prices for U.S consumers."

An industry-led survey of construction firms found that 45% reported project delays attributable to ICE-related labor shortages

4. Broader economic effects

A reduction of this magnitude in the size of the labor force could have impactful economic consequences, such as renewed upward pressure on wages, which could push inflation higher... There is the potential for these dynamics to trigger supply-side inflation similar to what we experienced during the coronavirus pandemic

However, some economists note the effect on inflation is ambiguous because businesses will experience reductions in both labor supply and demand for their goods and services

Other long-term effects cited by the CBO and others:

•Shrinking tax receipts will also stress the government’s budget, with actions taken on immigration during Trump's first year back in office adding half a trillion dollars more to the federal deficit by 2035
•The analysis explores the fiscal and demographic fallout, noting that the Congressional Budget Office estimates immigration helps shrink the federal deficit by $90 billion a year. Without new arrivals, the U.S. faces a looming demographic crisis where the working-age population shrinks

5. Nuance: Would stopping immigration help native workers?

Research is mixed on this point:

•The National Academies concluded that immigration's long-run effect on the wages of native-born workers overall is very small, with the clearest negative effects concentrated among prior immigrants
•The economic tradeoff is therefore real: lower immigration may reduce competition in some low-wage labor markets while also shrinking the workforce, consumer base and productive capacity in industries that rely heavily on immigrant labor
•A Brookings study found that immigration enforcement reduced construction employment for American-born workers and slowed homebuilding enough to raise new-home prices - suggesting that removing immigrant labor does not automatically create jobs for native workers because the sectors are interdependent.

Potential offsets often discussed are increased automation, higher wages to attract native workers, and AI. The CBO noted rising business adoption of artificial intelligence could help productivity stay afloat... By 2036, output in the U.S. economy will be 1% higher than it would have been without the help of AI, but described it as an "offsetting factor" rather than a full replacement and that AI doesn't pay taxes.

Bottom line: In an economy with record-low birth rates and retiring Baby Boomers, stopping immigration would not just cause shortages at the margins — it would reverse labor force growth entirely, create acute shortages in agriculture, construction, hospitality and health care, and lower the economy's potential growth rate. Short-term tightness might raise wages in some occupations, but most models find the net effect is fewer workers, slower GDP growth, and higher costs for consumers.

Citations (3)

  1. 1troweprice.comCompanies
    How U.S. immigration changes could impact inflation and the Fed | T. Rowe Price

    Backs: “What studies project if immigration is stopped or sharply reduced. Different models project different magnitudes, but all point to contraction:”

  2. 2theadvisermagazine.comNot yet classified
    Less immigration under Trump will contribute to 2 million-person labor force gap, CBO says

    Backs: “labor force by 2.1 million people - a combined total reduction of approximately 2.1 million workers, almost 1.3% of the labor supply. Over the next decade, the U.S. population is forecast to grow an average 0.3% each year...”

  3. 3brookings.eduNonprofits and think tanks
    Immigration and the macroeconomy after 2024

    Backs: “By 2028, the projected workforce could be reduced by 6.8 million workers—2.8 million due to changes in legal immigration, 4 million from illegal immigration enforcement. By 2035, that number could reach 15.7 million fewer workers. Brooking's modelling of a low-immigration Trump scenario vs high-immigration Harris…”