More answers like this
Grok 4.5Sep 30, 2026x-ai/grok-4.5-20260708

Was Joe Biden a good president?

No, not according to most Americans at the end of his term, though the question is inherently subjective and depends on one's priorities, values, and metrics of "good." Joe Biden (2021–2025) was a consequential one-term president with notable legislative and economic achievements amid major challenges, but low public approval, significant policy criticisms, and a sense that his tenure left the country more divided. Historians will debate his legacy for years; early public polls rate it poorly.[1]

Public Opinion and Approval

Biden entered office with approval around 57% amid the COVID-19 crisis and hope for normalcy. It declined steadily, hovering in the high 30s to low 40s for much of his term, ending around 37–40% approve / 54–60% disapprove in final Gallup and other polls.[[2]](/statistics/data/joseph-r-biden-public-approval)

End-of-term polls on his legacy were bleak:

•Gallup: 54% expected history to rate him "below average" or "poor" (17% below average, 37% poor); only 19% "outstanding" or "above average"; 26% average. This net negative was among the worst of recent presidents, closest to Richard Nixon.[3]
•AP-NORC: Roughly one-quarter called him a "good" or "great" president (under 10% "great"); about half "poor" or "terrible," with ~30% "average." Lower than views of Obama or even Trump's first term at exit.[1]

Partisan gaps were huge: Democrats more positive (though tepid), Republicans overwhelmingly negative. Factors included inflation pain, immigration, age-related concerns (culminating in his 2024 dropout), and Afghanistan.

Key Achievements

Biden secured major bipartisan and party-line legislation despite narrow margins:

•COVID response and recovery: American Rescue Plan (~$1.9 trillion) aided vaccines, testing, households, and states. Vaccination ramped up dramatically; the U.S. exited the acute phase.[4]
•Economy and jobs: ~15–17 million jobs added (records for consecutive monthly gains; only administration with jobs every month). Unemployment fell from 6.4% to averages near historic lows (~3.4–4.1% for extended periods, lowest in ~50 years at points), with strong gains for various demographics. Real GDP grew solidly (cumulative strong post-pandemic rebound, often outperforming forecasts and G7 peers). Stock markets hit records. Manufacturing investments surged via policy.[5]
•Infrastructure and industrial policy: Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (~$1.2 trillion) for roads, bridges, broadband, etc. CHIPS and Science Act boosted domestic semiconductors. Inflation Reduction Act: largest U.S. climate investment ever (~$370B+ for clean energy, EVs, etc.), plus healthcare measures (e.g., Medicare drug negotiation, ACA expansion—enrollment roughly doubled in some metrics).[6]
•Other domestic: Progress on student debt relief for millions (though Supreme Court blocked broader plans; ~$180B forgiven via other means); judicial appointments (including Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson); gun safety measures; Juneteenth holiday.
•Foreign policy: Rejoined Paris Agreement; strong (bipartisan) support for Ukraine against Russia, bolstering NATO; "America is back" diplomacy in Europe/Asia. Ended the Afghanistan war (longest U.S. war).

Supporters highlight a strong post-COVID recovery without recession (soft landing on inflation), historic climate/industrial investments, and competence restoring alliances—calling it among the most legislatively productive recent Democratic presidencies.[7]

Major Criticisms and Failures

•Inflation and cost of living: Peaked at 9.1% (highest in ~40 years); cumulative consumer prices rose ~20–21.5%. Gasoline, food, housing, etc., surged. Real wages lagged initially for many (though later recovered or grew for lower-wage workers). Stimulus spending and supply shocks (global) contributed; it became a core political vulnerability.[8]
•Afghanistan withdrawal (2021): Chaotic execution—Taliban rapid takeover, 13 U.S. service members killed in a bombing, abandoned allies/equipment, humanitarian fallout. Widely seen as a debacle despite ending the war.[9]
•Immigration/border: Record encounters/crossings (millions), strained resources, perceived lax enforcement early on. Later restrictions and higher deportations helped numbers fall, but it remained a top voter concern.
•Foreign policy mixed bag: Strong on Ukraine/NATO, but criticized on Israel-Gaza (support amid high civilian casualties/humanitarian crisis), Afghanistan, and handling of China/other rivals. Some saw overreach or inconsistency.
•Personal and political: Advanced age and visible decline fueled doubts about fitness, contributing to his late 2024 exit from the race (after a poor debate). Failed to fully "heal" divisions or deliver sustained political capital from wins. Child Tax Credit expansion (poverty reduction) was temporary. Deficits/debt rose significantly.[6]

Critics (across spectrum) argue these overshadowed wins: inflation eroded gains for ordinary people, border chaos and Afghanistan damaged credibility, and leadership style/age left him unable to sell achievements or unify.

Economic Nuance

The economy recovered robustly from COVID depths—faster/stronger than many peers, with tight labor markets boosting lower-end wages and record-low unemployment stretches. Inflation was brought down without a deep recession (rare "soft landing"). However, the cumulative price level increase was painful and politically toxic; housing/childcare/education costs remained high. Comparisons to Trump's pre-COVID years are apples-to-oranges due to the pandemic shock.[10]

Bottom Line

Biden delivered major progressive/climate/infrastructure wins and a solid recovery by many metrics, making him "consequential." Yet public verdict at exit was negative—driven by lived experiences of inflation, border issues, Afghanistan images, and questions of vigor—leading many to rate the presidency average-to-poor. "Good" depends on weighting: legislative output and jobs/climate vs. economic pain for households, security mishaps, and national cohesion. Polarization means Democrats often view it more favorably; Republicans harshly. Future historians may revise upward on long-term investments (chips, green energy, infrastructure) if they pay off, or downward if inflation/debt/immigration effects linger.

2.[/statistics/data/joseph-r-biden-public-approval](/statistics/data/joseph-r-biden-public-approval)

Citations (10)

  1. 1apnews.comNews and mediaquality 1.00
    https://apnews.com/article/biden-poll-low-ratings-obama-trump-390f25a858bf4cdec28719a2fe17b525

    Backs: “Historians will debate his legacy for years; early public polls rate it poorly.”

  2. 2
    /statistics/data/joseph-r-biden-public-approval

    Backs: “It declined steadily, hovering in the high 30s to low 40s for much of his term, ending around 37–40% approve / 54–60% disapprove in final Gallup and other polls.[[2]](/statistics/data/joseph-r-biden-public-approval)”

  3. 3gallup.comCompanies
    https://news.gallup.com/poll/654878/americans-think-history-rate-biden-presidency-negatively.aspx

    Backs: “This net negative was among the worst of recent presidents, closest to Richard Nixon.”

  4. 4theconversation.comNews and mediaquality 0.92
    https://theconversation.com/joe-bidens-legacy-four-successes-and-four-failures-246454

    Backs: “Vaccination ramped up dramatically; the U.S. exited the acute phase.”

  5. 5cnn.comNews and mediaquality 0.66
    https://cnn.com/2025/01/19/economy/us-biden-economic-legacy

    Backs: “Stock markets hit records. Manufacturing investments surged via policy.”

  6. 6rollingstone.comNews and mediaquality 0.56
    https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/joe-biden-president-good-bad-legacy-1235240727/

    Backs: “Inflation Reduction Act: largest U.S. climate investment ever (~$370B+ for clean energy, EVs, etc.), plus healthcare measures (e.g., Medicare drug negotiation, ACA expansion—enrollment roughly doubled in some metrics).”

  7. 7cfr.orgNonprofits and think tanks
    https://www.cfr.org/expert-brief/bidens-legacy-major-accomplishments-unfinished-business

    Backs: “Supporters highlight a strong post-COVID recovery without recession (soft landing on inflation), historic climate/industrial investments, and competence restoring alliances—calling it among the most legislatively productive recent Democratic presidencies.”

  8. 8nytimes.comNews and mediaquality 0.86
    https://nytimes.com/2025/01/15/us/politics/biden-presidential-legacy-trump.html

    Backs: “Stimulus spending and supply shocks (global) contributed; it became a core political vulnerability.”

  9. 9indiatimes.comNews and mediaquality 0.39
    https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshowprint/111932432.cms

    Backs: “Chaotic execution—Taliban rapid takeover, 13 U.S. service members killed in a bombing, abandoned allies/equipment, humanitarian fallout. Widely seen as a debacle despite ending the war.”

  10. 10factcheck.orgNonprofits and think tanks
    https://www.factcheck.org/2025/10/bidens-final-numbers/

    Backs: “Comparisons to Trump's pre-COVID years are apples-to-oranges due to the pandemic shock.”