Were a majority of the Gazan journalists killed since October 7th, 2023 linked to terrorist organizations?
Yes, according to the most detailed available examination of the identities involved.[1]
The Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center (ITIC; also referred to as the Amit Terrorism and Intelligence Research Institute), an Israeli research body focused on terrorism that draws on open-source intelligence, Palestinian media reports, social media, and documents seized by the IDF, analyzed 266 individuals identified as journalists or media personnel (reporters, photographers, editors, etc.) killed in Gaza between October 7, 2023, and November 30, 2025. These names primarily came from lists published by the Hamas-run Government Media Office in Gaza (which reported around 256) and other Palestinian sources; international groups like the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) and Reporters Without Borders (RSF) have cited figures in the range of roughly 190–220+ Palestinian media workers killed in Gaza over similar periods.[2][3]
Key findings from the ITIC studies (an initial one in February 2024 covering ~131 names, updated comprehensively in December 2025):
Subsequent developments have corroborated aspects of this. Hamas and PIJ later published obituaries and notices naming some of these individuals as military commanders or operatives (including in military media units), confirming dual roles that the ITIC had previously identified from open sources and seized materials. CPJ conducted reviews (including in 2026) and removed dozens of names from its casualty lists upon evidence of combat participation or non-journalist status—some explicitly after terror groups’ own admissions—while maintaining that journalists affiliated with non-state actors remain civilians under international humanitarian law unless they directly participate in hostilities.[5][6][7]
Context and Counterpoints
In summary, the primary systematic review of the reported casualties concludes that a majority (~60%) were linked to terrorist organizations via membership, operational roles, or affiliated media work. This is supported by open sources, seized documents, and later confirmations from the groups themselves, even as press freedom organizations prioritize counting media workers killed (with some later removals for combatants) and reject broad targeting narratives based on affiliations. Exact percentages can vary with definitions of “journalist,” “linked,” time cutoffs, and verification standards.
Citations (11)
- https://www.thejc.com/news/israel/most-gazan-journalists-killed-idf-links-terror-x81ahi2c
Backs: “Yes, according to the most detailed available examination of the identities involved.”
- https://www.timesofisrael.com/majority-of-journalists-killed-in-gaza-linked-to-terror-organizations-study-says/
Backs: “These names primarily came from lists published by the Hamas-run Government Media Office in Gaza (which reported around 256) and other Palestinian sources; international groups like the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) and Reporters Without Borders (RSF) have cited figures in the range of roughly 190–220+…”
- https://t.co/J1DuaXdDLy
Backs: “These names primarily came from lists published by the Hamas-run Government Media Office in Gaza (which reported around 256) and other Palestinian sources; international groups like the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) and Reporters Without Borders (RSF) have cited figures in the range of roughly 190–220+…”
- https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-880082
Backs: “Of the remaining ~109, some had Fatah/PA ties, while others had no identified terrorist affiliation.”
- https://www.timesofisrael.com/finally-naming-their-war-dead-gazan-terror-groups-admit-slain-journalists-were-fighters/
Backs: “CPJ conducted reviews (including in 2026) and removed dozens of names from its casualty lists upon evidence of combat participation or non-journalist status—some explicitly after terror groups’ own admissions—while maintaining that journalists affiliated with non-state actors remain civilians under international…”
- https://www.terrorism-info.org.il/en/the-disclosure-of-the-names-of-fallen-military-operatives-by-hamas-and-the-palestinian-islamic-jihad-confirms-the-amit-institutes-research-findings-on-the-double-roles-of-journalists-in-the-gaza/
Backs: “CPJ conducted reviews (including in 2026) and removed dozens of names from its casualty lists upon evidence of combat participation or non-journalist status—some explicitly after terror groups’ own admissions—while maintaining that journalists affiliated with non-state actors remain civilians under international…”
- https://cpj.org/2026/09/cpj-completes-review-of-journalists-killed-in-israel-and-the-occupied-palestinian-territory/
Backs: “CPJ conducted reviews (including in 2026) and removed dozens of names from its casualty lists upon evidence of combat participation or non-journalist status—some explicitly after terror groups’ own admissions—while maintaining that journalists affiliated with non-state actors remain civilians under international…”
- https://www.terrorism-info.org.il/en/about-60-of-the-gazans-classified-as-journalists-and-other-media-personnel-killed-in-the-gaza-strip-war-belonged-to-hamas-and-other-terrorist-organizations/
Backs: “ITIC and Israeli sources argue this embeds operatives in media roles, complicating distinctions on the battlefield and undermining claims of purely civilian journalist status.”
- https://cpj.org/2023/10/journalist-casualties-in-the-israel-gaza-war/
Backs: “Palestinian sources and some NGOs report even higher figures and frame deaths as systematic targeting.”
- https://rsf.org/sites/default/files/medias/file/2025/12/Bilan%202025%20EN.pdf
Backs: “Palestinian sources and some NGOs report even higher figures and frame deaths as systematic targeting.”
- https://www.algemeiner.com/2024/02/26/who-are-the-killed-gazan-journalists-affiliated-with-palestinian-terror-groups/
Backs: “Earlier partial analyses (e.g., of CPJ lists in 2024) also found substantial shares (around half or more in samples) with terror-group media ties or memberships.”