Will stopping immigration cause labor shortages?
Will halting immigration tighten the labor market? I'll pull recent research on the link to shortages.
Yes - according to the preponderance of economic research, stopping immigration would cause and exacerbate labor shortages, particularly in the United States given current demographics - though the effects would be uneven across sectors, time horizons and regions.
1. Immigration is currently the primary driver of labor force growth
Native-born population dynamics cannot replace it:
Without the immigration surge of 2022-2024, the U.S. working-age population would have been shrinking, and the prime-age labor force grew in large part because of immigration. Immigrants accounted for 84.7% of labor force growth since 2019
Projections:
2. Direct link to labor shortages
Recent evidence in 2025:
3. Sectoral concentration
Shortages would not be uniform. The U.S. labor market faces a growing crisis as restrictive immigration policies exacerbate shortages in sectors reliant on immigrant workers — construction, agriculture, and healthcare. With immigrant workers comprising 25% of construction labor, 66% of agriculture workers, and 15–28% of healthcare staff
Other reports put foreign-born share as:
Labor shortages are growing in sectors that rely heavily on immigrant workers, including agriculture, construction, food service, healthcare, and transportation, producing missed harvests, delayed construction, staffing gaps and slower payroll gains
A construction industry survey found 45% reported project delays attributable to ICE-related labor shortages, and one in five reported subcontractors had lost staff directly
A National Immigration Forum review noted restrictive policies have already led to labor shortages in key sectors such as agriculture, healthcare, construction, and hospitality
4. Why native-born workers do not simply fill the gap
Economic literature finds immigrants and native-born workers are often complements, not close substitutes:
5. Counterarguments and nuance
Not all analysts agree the effect is entirely negative:
Analysts agree immigration curbs have measurably tightened labor supply in specific sectors; they disagree on whether the net economic effect is corrosive or corrective
Bottom line
In a country with an aging population, sub-replacement fertility, and a shrinking native-born working-age population, stopping immigration would not create a large pool of available native-born workers to fill vacancies. Fed and CBO-connected modeling suggests the working-age population would decline and prime-age labor force growth would turn negative - as early as 2035 under high-deportation scenarios - leading to persistent shortages in labor-intensive, lower-wage and care sectors, slower GDP growth, and higher prices for immigrant-dependent goods and services, rather than lower unemployment for native-born workers.
Citations (3)
- Immigration and Changes in Labor Force Demographics - San Francisco Fed
Backs: “The Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco found that without immigration, the U.S. working-age population would have started shrinking in 2012, not 2025. The Bank's 2025 Economic Letter estimated more precisely: without new immigration, the U.S.”
- Economic research shows immigration is good for U.S. workers, the economy, and affordability
Backs: “"Reduced immigration contributes to labor shortages, driving inflationary pressures as the supply of immigrant-dependent goods and services shrinks". The same finding is summarized as: Reduced immigration contributes to labor shortages, driving inflationary pressures as the supply of immigrant-dependent goods and…”
- The Consequences of Net Negative Migration in 2025: Implications for the U.S. Economy, Workforce, and Global Competitiveness - National Immigration Forum
Backs: “The same finding is summarized as: Reduced immigration contributes to labor shortages, driving inflationary pressures as the supply of immigrant-dependent goods and services shrinks. Recent evidence in 2025: Payroll growth averaged just 29,000 jobs per month between October and December 2025, down sharply from 166,000…”