More answers like this
Grok 4.5Sep 24, 2026x-ai/grok-4.5-20260708

Was Joe Biden a good president?

No, there is no objective "yes" or "no"—it depends on your values, priorities, and which metrics you emphasize. Presidential performance is inherently subjective and polarized in the U.S. Assessments break down along partisan lines, with Democrats generally viewing Biden more favorably and Republicans far less so. Here's a balanced overview grounded in data, major policies, outcomes, and contemporary evaluations (Biden served 2021–2025).No objective yes/no answer exists. "Good president" is subjective and depends on priorities (economy, foreign policy, social issues, competence, partisanship). Evaluations of Joe Biden (46th president, 2021–2025) are highly polarized: Democrats largely view him positively or as average-to-good; Republicans overwhelmingly negatively; independents lean critical. Public opinion and early historian rankings reflect this split, with low overall approval and mixed legacy assessments.[1]

Approval Ratings and Public Opinion

Biden’s Gallup average job approval was 42.2%—the second-lowest among post-WWII presidents (only Trump’s first term was lower at ~41%). He started strong (~57% early 2021) but fell after the Afghanistan withdrawal and never sustained above 50% thereafter. Final ratings hovered around 36–40%, with deep partisan gaps (~85% Democrats approve on average vs. ~6% Republicans; independents ~39%).[1]

An AP-NORC poll near the end of his term found only about 25% of Americans called him a “great” or “good” president (far lower than Obama’s exit numbers; similar in negativity to views of Trump’s first term for many). Roughly half viewed it as poor/terrible, and ~30% average. Views tracked party lines closely. Early historian surveys (e.g., APSA 2024) ranked him around 14th overall—respectable mid-tier, ahead of several recent presidents but not elite.[2]

Economy

Strong on quantity metrics, weaker on cost-of-living perception:

•Jobs and unemployment: ~15–16+ million jobs added (recovery from COVID lows plus expansion). Unemployment fell from 6.4% at inauguration to a low of 3.4% and ended near 4%. Longest stretch of sub-4% unemployment in decades; record lows for some demographic groups at points. Job creation every month.[3]
•Growth: Solid real GDP growth (often 2.5%+ annually; stronger post-COVID recovery than many peers).
•Inflation and wages: Major weakness. CPI rose cumulatively ~20–21.5% (peak 9.1% YoY in mid-2022, highest in 40 years; averaged ~5%). Driven by stimulus, supply chains, energy shocks (Ukraine war), and demand. Real wages lagged early then partially recovered as inflation cooled to ~2–3% range by end of term, but higher price levels (groceries, housing, gas) persisted as a top voter complaint. Stock market rose substantially.[3]

The American Rescue Plan ($1.9T COVID relief) accelerated recovery but contributed to inflation debate. Later bills (Infrastructure, CHIPS, IRA) spurred manufacturing/clean energy investment announcements exceeding $1T privately matched in some tallies.

Major Legislation and Domestic Policy

Biden secured significant bills despite narrow congressional margins:

•Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (~$1T+): Roads, bridges, broadband, etc.
•CHIPS and Science Act: Semiconductor/manufacturing boost.
•Inflation Reduction Act: Largest U.S. climate/clean energy investment historically, Medicare drug price negotiation, ACA subsidy extensions, corporate minimum tax elements. Claimed deficit reduction over time.
•Other: American Rescue Plan; gun safety (Bipartisan Safer Communities Act); Respect for Marriage Act; PACT Act (veterans); student debt relief efforts (tens of billions canceled via various programs, though broader plans faced court blocks); record ACA marketplace enrollment; judicial appointments (hundreds confirmed).[4]

COVID vaccine rollout scaled massively early on. Criticisms included temporary expansions (e.g., child tax credit) that expired, raising poverty metrics afterward, and perceptions of overspending.

Foreign Policy and Other Issues

•Ukraine/NATO: Strong, sustained support enabling Ukraine to hold most territory against Russia; NATO expanded and many members hit 2% defense spending. “America is back” framing restored alliances after Trump-era strains.[5]
•Afghanistan: Completed Trump-negotiated withdrawal but execution was chaotic (rapid Afghan collapse, 13 U.S. service members killed in bombing, abandoned equipment/allies). Major early approval drop.[6]
•Middle East/China/climate: Rejoined Paris Agreement; mixed Israel-Gaza handling (strong Israel support amid high civilian casualties drew left criticism; right often wanted more). Ongoing China competition. Energy policy shifted (initial pauses then increases in production/leases).
•Border/immigration: Record migrant encounters/crossings early/mid-term (millions); later executive restrictions reduced numbers and raised deportations. Persistent criticism of enforcement and asylum processing.
•Age and fitness: Late-term concerns (debates, special counsel comments on memory) factored into his decision not to seek re-election and public perceptions of decline.

Bottom Line

Biden’s term featured major legislative output (infrastructure, industrial policy, climate, health) and a robust post-COVID jobs/growth recovery, plus alliance-building on Ukraine. These are concrete positives cited by supporters and some historians. Persistent high inflation’s cost-of-living hit, the Afghanistan exit, border volumes, and personal/age-related perceptions were decisive negatives for many voters—contributing to Democratic losses in 2024 and low retrospective ratings.[7]

Whether he was “good” hinges on weighting: If you prioritize industrial policy, climate investment, alliance management, and low unemployment, the case is stronger. If inflation pain, immigration control, foreign policy execution, or executive vigor dominate, the case is weaker. Partisan media and motivated reasoning amplify differences. Long-term legacy (e.g., IRA impacts, Ukraine outcome, judicial imprint) will clarify further with time, data, and successors’ actions. Data above draws from Gallup, BLS/BEA indicators, FactCheck.org summaries, administration records, and contemporary analyses.

Citations (7)

  1. 1gallup.comCompanies
    https://news.gallup.com/poll/655298/biden-job-approval-second-lowest-among-post-wwii-presidents.aspx

    Backs: “Here's a balanced overview grounded in data, major policies, outcomes, and contemporary evaluations (Biden served 2021–2025).No objective yes/no answer exists. "Good president" is subjective and depends on priorities (economy, foreign policy, social issues, competence, partisanship).”

  2. 2apnorc.orgAcademic
    https://apnorc.org/projects/bidens-legacy-as-president/

    Backs: “An AP-NORC poll near the end of his term found only about 25% of Americans called him a “great” or “good” president (far lower than Obama’s exit numbers; similar in negativity to views of Trump’s first term for many).”

  3. 3factcheck.orgNonprofits and think tanks
    https://www.factcheck.org/2025/10/bidens-final-numbers/

    Backs: “Early historian surveys (e.g., APSA 2024) ranked him around 14th overall—respectable mid-tier, ahead of several recent presidents but not elite.[[”

  4. 4ucsb.eduAcademic
    https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/administration-fact-sheet-the-biden-harris-administration-record

    Backs: “climate/clean energy investment historically, Medicare drug price negotiation, ACA subsidy extensions, corporate minimum tax elements. Claimed deficit reduction over time.”

  5. 5cfr.orgNonprofits and think tanks
    https://www.cfr.org/articles/bidens-legacy-major-accomplishments-unfinished-business

    Backs: “COVID vaccine rollout scaled massively early on. Criticisms included temporary expansions (e.g., child tax credit) that expired, raising poverty metrics afterward, and perceptions of overspending.”

  6. 6theconversation.comNews and mediaquality 0.92
    https://theconversation.com/joe-bidens-legacy-four-successes-and-four-failures-246454

    Backs: “Ukraine/NATO: Strong, sustained support enabling Ukraine to hold most territory against Russia; NATO expanded and many members hit 2% defense spending. “America is back” framing restored alliances after Trump-era strains.”

  7. 7rollingstone.comNews and mediaquality 0.56
    https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/joe-biden-president-good-bad-legacy-1235240727/

    Backs: “Biden’s term featured major legislative output (infrastructure, industrial policy, climate, health) and a robust post-COVID jobs/growth recovery, plus alliance-building on Ukraine.”