More answers like this
Claude Sonnet 5Sep 15, 2026anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-20260630

Is political polarization worse than it's been in the past?

The evidence suggests political polarization—at least in the U.S.—is worse than it's been in recent history, but whether it's the "worst ever" depends heavily on how you measure it and what time frame you compare to. Here's the nuanced picture:

Congressional/Elite Polarization: Yes, Historically High

By the most common quantitative measure (DW-NOMINATE scores, which track how members of Congress vote), ideological distance between the parties began to grow during the 1970s to the extent that Congress is now more polarized than at any time since the late 1870s Reconstruction Era. That's a very long stretch of relatively low polarization ending.

Today, whereas there used to be many Republicans who were less conservative than the most conservative Democrat, and vice versa, there is no overlap today—the most liberal Republican is still more conservative than the most conservative Democrat. Pew estimates only about two dozen ideological moderates remain in Congress.

However, some scholars caution against over-interpreting this. Some political scientists have pointed out that viewed within the context of data from the last two centuries, today's levels of polarization are not such an alarming anomaly compared to those occurring during the time of slavery and similar points along the historical continuum.

There's also a methodological debate: some measurements suggest more division, but what they actually show is simply that the voting behavior of politicians has become more predictable—that doesn't necessarily mean politicians are farther apart on policy issues than in the past, according to political scientist Frances Lee. She notes changes in the scope of policy issues over time are often missed—even though measurements show increasing party division on civil rights issues, many of today's votes are narrower in effect than 1960s civil rights legislation.

Public/Mass Polarization: More Complicated

Among ordinary voters, the story is less clear-cut than among politicians:

•Affective polarization (how much people dislike the opposing party) does appear to be at a modern high. Republicans and Democrats are more divided along ideological lines and partisan antipathy is deeper and more extensive than at any point in recent history, driven by growing contempt that many Republicans and Democrats have for the opposing party—sentiments that today are broader and deeper than in the recent past.
•Internationally, the U.S. stands out. Finkel et al. argue that the state of U.S. affective polarization is exceptional, with the U.S. having suffered the largest increase in affective polarization over the last 40 years compared to 12 OECD countries.
•But ideological polarization among ordinary citizens is less dramatic than the elite trend suggests. For much of the second half of the 20th century, most people were not particularly stable in their ideological views, so ideological polarization was not as dramatic among the people as it was among their elected leaders. And even now, the general public is less divided on a range of issues than in the past, with many policies having bipartisan support.
•Globally, ideological polarization does not appear to have increased amongst the mass public at a global scale—this is in contrast to the trend observed in the United States, where growing ideological polarization is now well documented.

A Perception Gap

Interestingly, some researchers argue the feeling of polarization exceeds the reality. Cambridge researcher De-Wit argues that polarisation in the US can feel much worse than it is, even while acknowledging that political groups have moved further apart in recent years.

Bottom Line

•Compared to the mid-20th century (roughly 1940s–1970s, an unusually bipartisan era), yes, polarization is clearly worse—both among politicians and in partisan animosity among voters.
•Compared to the entire American history (including the Civil War/Reconstruction era), it's less clear that today is unprecedented—some scholars see current levels as comparable to, not exceeding, past peaks of division.
•The "gap in feelings" between parties (affective polarization) does appear to be at a genuinely exceptional modern high, both historically and compared to other democracies, even if disagreement on actual policy issues is sometimes overstated.

So the honest answer is: worse than the relatively calm mid-20th century baseline most people compare it to, but not necessarily an all-time historical extreme—and how "polarized" feels can outpace how polarized things actually are on policy substance.

Citations (15)

  1. 1usc.eduAcademic
    Political polarization at its worst since the Civil War - USC Today

    Source excerpt: “Following a period of a much more balanced Congress during the middle of the 20th century, ideological distance between the parties began to grow duri...”

  2. 2dividedwefall.orgNot yet classified
    Political Polarization in America: A Historical Analysis | Divided We Fall

    Source excerpt: “Whereas there used to be many Republicans who were less conservative than the most conservative Democrat, and vice versa, there is no overlap today. T...”

  3. 3dividedwefall.orgNot yet classified
    Political Polarization in America: A Historical Analysis | Divided We Fall

    Source excerpt: “Pew estimates only about two dozen ideological moderates remain in Congress. ”

  4. 4usc.eduAcademic
    Political polarization at its worst since the Civil War - USC Today

    Source excerpt: “Some political scientists have pointed out that — viewed within the context of data from the last two centuries — today’s levels of polarization are n...”

  5. 5knowablemagazine.orgNews and media
    Divided we stand: The rise of political animosity

    Source excerpt: “In fact, Lee adds, while some measurements suggest more division, what they actually show is simply that the voting behavior of politicians has become...”

  6. 6knowablemagazine.orgNews and media
    Divided we stand: The rise of political animosity

    Source excerpt: “What is often missed, Lee explains, are changes in the scope of policy issues over time. For example, even though measurements show increasing party d...”

  7. 7pewresearch.orgNonprofits and think tanks
    Political Polarization in the American Public | Pew Research Center

    Source excerpt: “Republicans and Democrats are more divided along ideological lines – and partisan acrimony is deeper and more extensive – than at any point in recent ...”

  8. 8pewresearch.orgNonprofits and think tanks
    Political Polarization in the American Public | Pew Research Center

    Source excerpt: “Beyond the rise in ideological consistency, another major element in polarization has been the growing contempt that many Republicans and Democrats ha...”

  9. 9pewresearch.orgNonprofits and think tanks
    Political Polarization in the American Public | Pew Research Center

    Source excerpt: “But today, these sentiments are broader and deeper than in the recent past.”

  10. 10arxiv.orgAcademic
    Towards global equity in political polarization research

    Source excerpt: “argue that the state of U.S. affective polarization is exceptional, with the U.S. having suffered the largest increase in affective polarization over ...”

  11. 11dividedwefall.orgNot yet classified
    Political Polarization in America: A Historical Analysis | Divided We Fall

    Source excerpt: “To be sure, many individuals felt a close attachment to and consistently supported a particular political party, but for much of the second half of th...”

  12. 12facinghistory.orgNonprofits and think tanks
    Political Polarization in the United States | Facing History & Ourselves

    Source excerpt: “In addition, the general public is less divided on a range of issues than in the past. Many policies have bipartisan support, or support from members ...”

  13. 13arxiv.orgAcademic
    Towards global equity in political polarization research

    Source excerpt: “However, at a global scale, ideological polarization does not appear to have increased amongst the mass public ([6], SM). This is in contrast to the t...”

  14. 14cam.ac.ukAcademic
    Political division in the US surged from 2008 onwards | University of Cambridge

    Source excerpt: “· However, De-Wit argues that polarisation in the US can feel much worse than it is. ”

  15. 15cam.ac.ukAcademic
    Political division in the US surged from 2008 onwards | University of Cambridge

    Source excerpt: ““Political groups have moved further apart in recent years, but these divisions ... Dr David Young said: “In the past, someone with left-wing views o...”