More answers like this
Gemini 3.5 FlashSep 13, 2026google/gemini-3.5-flash-20260519

Is political polarization worse than it's been in the past?

Whether political polarization is "worse" than in the past depends on how you measure it and which era you are comparing it to.

If the comparison is to the American Civil War (1861–1865), the answer is no. During that era, polarization led to the literal physical splintering of the country and a war that claimed hundreds of thousands of lives. Similarly, the late 1960s featured far more physical, political, and social violence than today—including high-profile assassinations (Martin Luther King Jr., Robert F. Kennedy), mass riots, and bombings.

However, if you are comparing today’s landscape to the mid-to-late 20th century, the answer is a resounding yes. By almost every metric used by political scientists, political polarization is at its highest level in over a century.

To understand why, it helps to look at the different ways researchers measure polarization and how today’s divisions are structurally different from the past.


1. Affective Polarization (Disliking the Other Side)

One of the most dramatic shifts in modern politics is the rise of affective polarization—meaning citizens don’t just disagree with the opposing party’s policies; they actively dislike and distrust the people who support them.

•The "Feeling Thermometer": Studies tracking public sentiment (such as a prominent multi-nation study by Brown University) show that affective polarization in the U.S. has risen faster since the late 1970s than in other major democracies like Canada, the UK, Germany, and Australia.
•Moral Dehumanization: According to Pew Research Center polling, the share of partisan voters who view the opposing party as "immoral" compared to other Americans has skyrocketed. In 2016, 47% of Republicans and 35% of Democrats viewed the other side as immoral; by 2022, those numbers had jumped to 72% and 63%, respectively.
•Personal Life: In 1960, only about 4% to 5% of Americans said they would be upset if their child married someone from the opposing political party. Today, that number has surged, with roughly half of Republicans and more than a third of Democrats saying they would be unhappy with an inter-party marriage in their family.

2. Ideological Polarization and "Sorting"

In the mid-20th century, the two major American parties were big, messy coalitions. You could easily find conservative Southern Democrats and highly liberal Northeast Republicans. Because of this overlap, bipartisanship was common.

Today, the parties have gone through a process called partisan sorting. Virtually all conservatives are now Republicans, and virtually all liberals are Democrats.

•Congressional Voting: Political scientists use "NOMINATE" scores to track how members of Congress vote relative to one another. This data shows that the ideological distance between the average Democrat and the average Republican in Congress is wider now than at any point since the Reconstruction Era (the late 1870s). Moderate politicians in Washington have virtually disappeared.
•Issue Polarization: A 2026 study by the University of Cambridge’s Political Psychology Lab analyzed decades of public opinion and found that divisions among regular U.S. citizens on core social and political issues (like abortion, immigration, and racial inequality) grew by 64% between 1988 and 2024. Interestingly, the researchers found that much of this issue-based stretch was driven by left-leaning Americans becoming significantly more socially liberal over time, while right-leaning Americans’ policy positions remained relatively stable but grew increasingly hostile toward the left.

3. What Makes Today's Polarization Unique?

While the U.S. has had periods of high tension before, the modern era features several unique drivers that prevent the "temperature" from cooling down:

•Negative Partisanship: Voters are increasingly driven not by a positive love for their own party, but by a deep fear and hatred of the other party. This makes compromise or crossing party lines look like "betrayal" to voters.
•The Modern Media Ecosystem: In the mid-20th century, Americans consumed news from a few highly centralized, objective broadcast networks. Today, the rise of partisan cable news, talk radio, and—most importantly—social media algorithms has created highly insular echo chambers. These algorithms prioritize content that triggers outrage, rewarding extreme voices and exacerbating the perception that the other side is an existential threat.
•Misperceptions: Because the loudest, most extreme voices dominate the media landscape, regular citizens have massive misperceptions about the "other side". Research shows that average Democrats and Republicans believe the average member of the opposing party holds much more extreme, caricature-like views than they actually do in real life.

Summary

If "worse" means armed conflict, we are not at the levels of the 1860s. If "worse" means physical violence and civil unrest, we are generally still below the chaotic peak of the late 1960s.

However, in terms of systemic gridlock, the complete sorting of our social identities into two warring camps, and the sheer level of personal animosity that citizens feel toward their political opponents, political polarization in the United States is worse today than it has been at any point in living memory.

Citations (9)

  1. 1usc.eduAcademic
    usc.edu

    Backs: “Whether political polarization is "worse" than in the past depends on how you measure it and which era you are comparing it to.”

  2. 2facinghistory.orgNonprofits and think tanks
    facinghistory.org

    Backs: “Whether political polarization is "worse" than in the past depends on how you measure it and which era you are comparing it to.”

  3. 3wikipedia.orgEncyclopedias and referencequality 0.83
    wikipedia.org

    Backs: “Whether political polarization is "worse" than in the past depends on how you measure it and which era you are comparing it to.”

  4. 4quora.comForums and Q&A
    quora.com

    Backs: “Kennedy), mass riots, and bombings. However, if you are comparing today’s landscape to the mid-to-late 20th century, the answer is a resounding yes.”

  5. 5reddit.comForums and Q&A
    reddit.com

    Backs: “Kennedy), mass riots, and bombings. However, if you are comparing today’s landscape to the mid-to-late 20th century, the answer is a resounding yes.”

  6. 6brown.eduAcademic
    brown.edu

    Backs: “Affective Polarization (Disliking the Other Side). One of the most dramatic shifts in modern politics is the rise of affective polarization—meaning citizens don’t just disagree with the opposing party’s policies; they actively dislike and distrust the people who support them. The "Feeling Thermometer": Studies…”

  7. 7syr.eduAcademic
    syr.edu

    Backs: “Moral Dehumanization: According to Pew Research Center polling, the share of partisan voters who view the opposing party as "immoral" compared to other Americans has skyrocketed. In 2016, 47% of Republicans and 35% of Democrats viewed the other side as immoral; by 2022, those numbers had jumped to 72% and 63%,…”

  8. 8cam.ac.ukAcademic
    cam.ac.uk

    Backs: “Today, the parties have gone through a process called partisan sorting. Virtually all conservatives are now Republicans, and virtually all liberals are Democrats.”

  9. 9cam.ac.ukAcademic
    cam.ac.uk

    Backs: “Issue Polarization: A 2026 study by the University of Cambridge’s Political Psychology Lab analyzed decades of public opinion and found that divisions among regular U.S. citizens on core social and political issues (like abortion, immigration, and racial inequality) grew by 64% between 1988 and 2024. Interestingly,…”