More answers like this
Muse Spark 1.2Sep 12, 2026meta/muse-spark-1.2-20260805

Is political polarization worse than it's been in the past?

Polarization is debatable — I'll pull the latest data to compare today with past peaks.

It depends on time frame and type of polarization measured - but by most measures of the modern era, yes. By measures of all of American history, no.

1. By measures of the last 50-100 years, polarization is at a modern high

In Congress (elite polarization):

> A Pew Research Center analysis finds that, on average, Democrats and Republicans are farther apart ideologically today than at any time in the past 50 years.

This is measured by DW-NOMINATE scores, which place lawmakers on a liberal-conservative scale based on roll-call voting:

•Both parties have grown more ideologically cohesive. There are now only about two dozen moderate Democrats and Republicans left on Capitol Hill, versus more than 160 in 1971-72.
•Both parties have moved further away from the ideological center since the early 1970s. Democrats on average have become somewhat more liberal, while Republicans on average have become much more conservative.

For example, House Democrats moved from about -0.31 to -0.38, while House Republicans moved from 0.25 to nearly 0.51.

Similar academic work using NOMINATE scores finds:

> Following a period of a much more balanced Congress during the middle of the 20th century, ideological distance between the parties began to grow during the 1970s to the extent that Congress is now more polarized than at any time since the late 1870s Reconstruction Era.

One way to see this is the "overlap interval" - how many Republicans are to the left of the most conservative Democrat and vice versa. Today, the overlap interval is zero.

> This was certainly not always true...In the 1960s, for instance, you had intervals where about 50 percent of the legislators in the two parties overlapped.

Since 2002 in the House and 2004 in the Senate there has been no overlap at all between the least liberal Democrats and the least conservative Republicans.

Researchers also note the shift has been asymmetric:

> Polarization among U.S. legislators is asymmetric, as it has primarily been driven by a rightward shift among Republicans

Among the public (mass polarization):

Pew Research Center's long-running surveys find:

> Republicans and Democrats are more divided along ideological lines – and partisan antipathy is deeper and more extensive – than at any point in the last two decades.

Specific trends:

•The overall share of Americans who express consistently conservative or consistently liberal opinions has doubled over the past two decades from 10% to 21%.
•Today, 92% of Republicans are to the right of the median Democrat, and 94% of Democrats are to the left of the median Republican.
•In 1994, 17% of Republicans had very unfavorable opinions of Democrats and 16% of Democrats had very unfavorable views of Republicans. Since then, highly negative views have more than doubled: 43% of Republicans and 38% of Democrats now view the opposite party in strongly negative terms. By 2020, that figure reached nearly 55% of both parties expressing "very unfavorable" views.
•Researchers note previous research suggesting that political polarization in the United States is more pronounced now than in the past -- at least among members of the nation's major political parties

A distinction is often made between:

•Ideological polarization: distance on policy issues
•Affective polarization: feeling more negatively toward the other party than your own

Studies find:

> In the US, affective polarization has increased more dramatically since the late 1970s than in the eight other countries they examined

And:

> Indeed, by many measures political polarization has been climbing for decades and is at its highest levels in modern history (some analysts say the worst since the Civil War)

2. By measures of the last 200+ years, no - the Civil War era was worse

Many historians and political scientists caution against saying today is the most divided ever:

> Some political scientists have pointed out that — viewed within the context of data from the last two centuries — today's levels of polarization are not such an alarming anomaly compared to those occurring during the time of slavery and similar points along the historical continuum.

> For all the hype about the ruptures and partisan rancor in contemporary American society, the strife pales in comparison with much of the nation's past.

A prominent Civil War historian argues:

> As a historian who has written and taught about the Civil War era for several decades, I know that current divisions pale in comparison to those of the mid-19th century.

Between Lincoln's election in 1860 and Lee's surrender in 1865, the nation literally broke apart, with more than 3 million men taking up arms and at least 620,000 military deaths — the equivalent of approximately 6.5 million dead in 2020. Earlier eras also featured violence inside Congress itself, such as the caning of Senator Charles Sumner in 1856, and secession of seven states after the 1860 election.

Brookings scholars similarly note:

> Today's social conflicts and partisan strife pale in comparison with much of the nation's past. Recall the racial apartheid that scarred America for a century after the end of slavery, and the urban riots and anti-war protests that inflamed the country during the 1960s.

Bottom line

•Compared to the mid-20th century — a relatively low-polarization period when liberal Republicans and conservative Democrats overlapped and compromise was common — polarization today is significantly worse.
•Compared to the late 19th century and especially the 1850s-1860s and Reconstruction, polarization today is not unprecedented in its ideological distance among elites, though the nature of division is different.

Much of today's increase is driven not just by Americans becoming more ideologically extreme on issues, but by partisan sorting — liberals becoming Democrats and conservatives becoming Republicans — and especially by affective polarization: disliking and distrusting the other side, seeing its policies as a threat to the nation's well-being, even if policy differences have not grown as fast as mutual animosity.

Citations (4)

  1. 1pewresearch.orgNonprofits and think tanks
    The polarization in today’s Congress has roots that go back decades

    Backs: “By measures of the last 50-100 years, polarization is at a modern high. In Congress (elite polarization): A Pew Research Center analysis finds that, on average, Democrats and Republicans are farther apart ideologically today than at any time in the past 50 years.”

  2. 2usc.eduAcademic
    Political polarization at its worst since the Civil War

    Backs: “For example, House Democrats moved from about -0.31 to -0.38, while House Republicans moved from 0.25 to nearly 0.51. Similar academic work using NOMINATE scores finds: Following a period of a much more balanced Congress during the middle of the 20th century, ideological distance between the parties began to grow…”

  3. 3pewresearch.orgNonprofits and think tanks
    Political Polarization in the American Public

    Backs: “Among the public (mass polarization): Pew Research Center's long-running surveys find: Republicans and Democrats are more divided along ideological lines – and partisan antipathy is deeper and more extensive – than at any point in the last two decades.”

  4. 4govexec.comNews and mediaquality 0.87
    Think the U.S. is More Polarized Than Ever? You Don’t Know History

    Backs: “For all the hype about the ruptures and partisan rancor in contemporary American society, the strife pales in comparison with much of the nation's past. A prominent Civil War historian argues: As a historian who has written and taught about the Civil War era for several decades, I know that current divisions pale in…”