More answers like this
Muse Spark 1.2Sep 12, 2026meta/muse-spark-1.2-20260805

Will stopping immigration cause labor shortages?

Will halting immigration trigger labor shortages? I'll pull the latest research on how immigration shapes the workforce.

Yes, stopping immigration would be expected to increase labor shortages in the short to medium term, according to research from the Federal Reserve and recent labor market studies - though the effect is uneven by industry and location.

1. Recent evidence: less immigration = tighter labor market

•Recent surge cooled shortages: The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City found "This flow of immigrant workers has acted as a powerful catalyst in cooling overheated labor markets and tempering wage growth"
•Recent decline worsened shortages: A 2022 Kansas City Fed analysis found "U.S. labor markets are currently experiencing unprecedented labor shortages. Reduced immigration flows in recent years have contributed to these labor supply shortages and tightened labor markets."

That study found from 2016-2021, when net international migration fell steadily:

•Mean real earnings increased by 9 percent, consistent with more intense competition for workers
•The job vacancy rate increased from an average of 3.1 percent to 4.6 percent, implying about one in 20 jobs was unfilled

2. Effects are concentrated in immigrant-reliant industries

The Fed found the relationship was not uniform:

> "immigration has uneven effects across sectors and labor markets, suggesting outcomes from increased immigration may vary by industry and location."

•Industries with larger foreign-born shares saw bigger vacancy increases: "industries that had a larger share of foreignborn workers in 2015 tended to experience more significant increases in job vacancy rates from 2016 to 2021, suggesting that reduced immigration exacerbated labor shortages." Examples included construction, leisure and hospitality, and other services
•In reverse, more immigrants reduced vacancies: From December 2021 to December 2023, "every 1.0 percentage point increase in employment growth coming from immigrant workers in an industry corresponded to a nearly 0.5 percentage point decline in job vacancy rates, on average." For example in leisure and hospitality, immigrant employment increased by more than 5.5 percentage points, while vacancy rate declined by 4.4 percentage points

Construction and food service have become increasingly reliant:

> "In construction and extraction occupations, the foreign-born share of employment rose from about 22% in 2003 to almost 36% in 2024"

3. Why native-born workers do not quickly fill the gap

Economists describe a "structural mismatch":

> "In many labor-intensive roles that rely heavily on immigrants, employers can't easily replace them with American workers."

Recent experience after the 2025 immigration crackdown illustrates this:

•Net migration may have been negative in 2025 for the first time in at least 50 years, but "That squeeze coincided with a rise in joblessness among the native-born, even as some businesses say it's becoming more challenging to fill positions."
•"The US-born unemployment rate has been going up. The US-born labor force participation rate has dropped" even after withdrawal of immigrants "we don't see any sign of the US-born workers getting more employment because of that."

Bloomberg reporting noted firms in construction, leisure and hospitality and food production say it's taking longer to find workers, with few native-born job seekers turning out - consistent with pandemic experience when "We had the highest wage inflation we've ever seen in those jobs, and yet we couldn't get anybody into them" until immigration flows resumed

Additional research found enforcement causes broader job losses, not gains for natives:

•A Brookings Institution study of 86 metro areas found ICE surges in the first nine months of 2025 "directly led to the loss of at least 668,000 jobs... What's more, the toll was not limited to immigrants: Between 51,000 and 297,000 of the lost jobs were held by American-born workers."

Reasons given:

1.Many immigrants stopped reporting to work out of fear
2.Many businesses can't easily replace missing workers... many businesses scale back or even shut down
3.Reduced consumer spending leads employers to cut back

Interdependence matters, especially in construction: "A framing crew can't hand off work to a roofing crew if it can't finish the job because it is suddenly missing half its workers"

Immigrants also enable others to work. In 2019 more than 25 percent of directcare workers were foreign born and higher immigration has been found to lower childcare prices and increase hours worked by high-skilled women

4. Demographic context

With birth rates at a record low and baby boomers retiring, immigration is described as "a main avenue for growth of the labor force"

Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco research found "the working-age population would have likely started shrinking over a decade ago if not for immigration"

5. Caveats and longer-term adjustment

•Wage adjustment: Less immigration is associated with faster earnings growth as employers raise wages to attract workers and some researchers argue that over time higher wages could draw people back.

One researcher favoring stricter enforcement noted: "In the long run, a decline in the immigrant population could lead to higher wages and more flexible working conditions, drawing more people into the labor force" but "some of them may have to overcome health challenges, criminal records or other issues" and "I don't know if one year is going to be enough to make much difference."

•Administration view: The White House has argued "prime age labor force participation has increased to a near 25-year high as more and more Americans are coming off the sidelines" though the same data show participation for those born in the US has dropped and is near the lowest since 2021
•Structural limits: Comparative research on Japan and the UK suggests "immigration policies will not alleviate labor and skill shortages unless accompanied by the transformation of employment" - i.e., training, wages, and working conditions also matter.

Bottom line

Stopping immigration entirely would not create a 1-for-1 job opening for native workers. Evidence indicates it would:

•Raise vacancy rates and labor costs in sectors like construction, hospitality, agriculture, and direct care
•Reduce overall labor supply growth and impose a "speed limit" for the economy
•Potentially cause ripple-effect job losses for native workers in affected local economies, rather than gains

Over many years, higher wages, automation, and training could induce some native workers to enter those occupations, but studies show that adjustment is slow and incomplete, and does not offset near-term shortages.

Citations (4)

  1. #### FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF KANSAS CITY \| MAY 22, 2024

    Backs: “Yes, stopping immigration would be expected to increase labor shortages in the short to medium term, according to research from the Federal Reserve and recent labor market studies - though the effect is uneven by industry and location. 1. Recent evidence: less immigration = tighter labor market. Recent surge cooled…”

  2. #### FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF KANSAS CITY \| MAY 11, 2022

    Backs: “Recent decline worsened shortages: A 2022 Kansas City Fed analysis found "U.S. labor markets are currently experiencing unprecedented labor shortages.”

  3. 3bloomberglaw.comNews and media
    Immigration Crackdown Fails to Deliver Jobs for US-Born Workers

    Backs: “points, while vacancy rate declined by 4.4 percentage points. Construction and food service have become increasingly reliant: "In construction and extraction occupations, the foreign-born share of employment rose from about 22% in 2003 to almost 36% in 2024"”

  4. 4phys.orgNews and mediaquality 0.85
    Report: ICE surges have triggered massive job losses—including among Americans

    Backs: “A Brookings Institution study of 86 metro areas found ICE surges in the first nine months of 2025 "directly led to the loss of at least 668,000 jobs... What's more, the toll was not limited to immigrants: Between 51,000 and 297,000 of the lost jobs were held by American-born workers."”