More answers like this
Grok 4.5Sep 5, 2026x-ai/grok-4.5-20260708

Was Joe Biden a good president?

No single, objective answer exists—“good president” is a value judgment that depends on your priorities (economy, borders, foreign policy, inflation, institutional norms, etc.). Joe Biden’s record (2021–2025) is mixed and highly polarized; public approval was persistently underwater for most of his term, and he left office with historically low ratings for a modern president.

Measurable outcomes and record

•Economy: Unemployment fell to multi-decade lows and the post-COVID recovery continued, with strong nominal wage growth in some periods and major legislation (Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, CHIPS and Science Act, Inflation Reduction Act). Real wages for many workers stagnated or declined during the 2021–2023 inflation spike (CPI peaked above 9%, the highest in 40 years). Deficit spending remained elevated; energy prices and housing costs hurt lower- and middle-income households. The “soft landing” narrative was real by 2024, but the inflation shock was the dominant kitchen-table issue.
•Immigration/border: Encounters at the southwest border hit record highs (CBP data). The administration initially rolled back Trump-era restrictions, then later tightened rules amid political pressure. Fentanyl deaths soared. This was widely viewed as a policy and messaging failure even by many Democrats.
•Foreign policy and security: The Afghanistan withdrawal (2021) was chaotic—13 U.S. service members killed in a suicide bombing, abandoned equipment, and a rapid Taliban takeover. Aid to Ukraine after the 2022 Russian invasion was substantial and bipartisan in Congress. The Israel-Hamas war after October 7, 2023, produced intense domestic division; Biden’s team supplied arms to Israel while pressing for restraint and humanitarian access. China competition continued (export controls, AUKUS, etc.) with mixed results on deterrence.
•COVID and public health: Vaccines and treatments were already rolling out; excess deaths declined from 2021 peaks. Mandates and school closures were contentious and later walked back. Long COVID and learning loss remain issues.
•Other domestic: Student-loan forgiveness efforts were repeatedly blocked by courts. Crime rates (FBI data) rose sharply in 2020 then partially receded; retail theft and urban disorder remained salient. Judicial appointments shifted the courts leftward relative to the prior administration. Age and cognitive fitness became an open liability—evident in debates, special counsel commentary, and his eventual decision not to seek re-election in 2024.

Strongest arguments on each side

Case that he was good/successful: Stabilized the country after Trump/COVID chaos, delivered large industrial-policy bills that reshoring advocates wanted, kept NATO unified on Ukraine, expanded ACA-related coverage, and appointed the first female VP plus a diverse Cabinet. Supporters credit him with “restoring norms” and competence after January 6.

Case that he was poor/failed: Highest inflation in generations eroded real incomes, border policy produced visible disorder and strained cities, the Afghanistan exit damaged deterrence, and declining verbal acuity plus staff insulation raised questions about who was actually running the executive branch. Critics argue the administration prioritized progressive priorities (energy restrictions early on, equity framing, student debt) over median-voter concerns and that institutional trust continued to erode.

Context that matters

Presidents are constrained by Congress, the Fed, courts, and exogenous shocks (COVID supply chains, Russia’s war, OPEC). Biden inherited a unique post-pandemic environment and a 50–50 Senate. Polarization meant almost no cross-party credit. Polling (Gallup, RCP averages) showed consistent majority disapproval after the first year; 2024 electoral results reflected that verdict for many voters.

History’s verdict will hinge on whether the industrial bills produce lasting semiconductor/energy capacity, how the inflation scar fades, and longer-term effects of the border and Afghanistan episodes. Short-term scorecard: competent legislative productivity on some priorities, clear underperformance on inflation control, border management, and projecting vigor/competence.

Citations (0)