Responses

Determining whether political polarization is worse than in the past depends on which era of history is used as a benchmark. In terms of modern, post-World War II history, yes, political polarization in the United States is worse than it has been in decades. By many metrics, the country is more divided now than at any point in living memory. However, looking at the entire arc of American histo

To answer whether political polarization is worse than in the past, political scientists and historians generally look at two different benchmarks: the entirety of U.S. history and the last several generations. The short answer is: No, it is not worse than it has ever been in U.S. history (as the country once fought a literal Civil War over its divisions). However, yes, it is worse than at any o

To answer whether political polarization is worse today than in the past, political scientists and historians generally look at two different benchmarks: what type of polarization is being measured, and which era of history is being used as a comparison. The short answer is yes, political polarization is worse than it has been in living memory (the last 50 to 60 years), and by some measures, the

No, Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine (beginning February 24, 2022) is not justified under international law, Just War theory, or the prevailing consensus of governments, legal experts, and international organizations. It constitutes a war of aggression that violates Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. “Justified” is partly subjective (depending on moral frameworks, national int

To answer whether political polarization is worse than in the past, political scientists and historians generally divide the comparison into two baselines: modern history (the last 50 to 70 years) and deep history (going back to the founding of the United States). The consensus is that while we are not in a state of literal armed conflict like the American Civil War, political polarization today

No, Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine (launched on 24 February 2022, following the 2014 annexation of Crimea and support for separatists in Donbas) is not justified under international law, and it fails standard criteria of just war theory according to the large majority of states, legal experts, and analysts.[[1]](https://www.cfr.org/articles/how-russias-invasion-ukraine-violates-internatio

The US political climate as of late 2026 (amid Trump’s second term and approaching midterms) is marked by extreme polarization, eroded trust in institutions, rising political violence/threats, contested election administration, and competing narratives of democratic threat. These dynamics create risks to social cohesion, effective governance, the rule of law, and democratic norms. Perceptions of t

No, Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine (launched on 24 February 2022) is not justified under international law, prevailing just war criteria, or the weight of available evidence. It constitutes a clear act of aggression violating the UN Charter’s prohibition on the use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state (Article 2(4)). Ukraine has a right to self

Most evidence points to yes — by many measures, U.S. political polarization today is more intense than at any point in the last 50-150 years, though there's nuance to that claim. Evidence that today's polarization is unusually severe In Congress/among elites: a Pew Research Center analysis finds that, on average, Democrats and Republicans are farther apart ideologically today than at any time i

The answer to whether political polarization is worse than in the past depends entirely on which past you are comparing it to. If you compare today’s political climate to the mid-to-late 20th century, the answer is an unequivocal yes—polarization is significantly worse. However, if you compare today to the mid-19th century, the answer is no; the United States was far more polarized during the Ci

Yes — by most measures, political polarization in the U.S. today is more severe than it has been in many decades, though the nature of that polarization is nuanced and some caveats are worth noting. The evidence for "worse than before" Affective polarization (dislike of the other side) has roughly doubled since the 1970s. Using the American National Election Studies' "feeling thermometer," the

Whether political polarization is "worse" today than in the past depends on how you measure it and which historical era you compare it to. Political scientists and historians generally agree that political polarization is worse today than at any point in modern history (the last 50 to 80 years). However, looking at the entire arc of American history, the country has survived eras of equal or gre

Whether political polarization is "worse" than in the past depends on which era of history you use as a benchmark. If you compare today to the mid-to-late 20th century, the answer is a resounding yes. However, if you look further back into the arc of American history, the country has survived several eras of equal or even greater division. --- 1. Yes, It is Worse Than in Recent Memory For an

NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) is a collective defense alliance whose net impact is widely debated and depends heavily on one's values, geography, and view of international order. It is not inherently "good" or "evil"; it is a tool of statecraft that has delivered clear security benefits for its members while producing mixed or negative outcomes in some interventions and contributing to

Short answer: Yes, by most measures—especially in the U.S. Political polarization today is generally considered more severe than at most points in recent historical memory, though the full picture is nuanced depending on what exactly you measure and over what timeframe. Evidence that polarization is at historic or near-historic highs In Congress/elite politics: DW-NOMINATE scores reveal that

To answer whether political polarization is worse today than in the past, political scientists and historians look at two different timeframes: deep American history and modern history (the last 50 to 80 years). The short answer is: No, it is not the worst it has ever been in U.S. history, but it is the worst it has been in modern history. While we are not in a state of physical warfare like the

Whether political polarization is "worse" than in the past depends heavily on how you measure it and which era of the past you are comparing it to. If you compare today to the last 50 to 60 years, yes, political polarization is at its worst in living memory. However, if you look at the broader arc of American history, the nation has survived periods of equal or even more destructive division. -

NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) is best understood as a defensive military alliance whose overall record leans toward being a stabilizing force for its members and much of Europe, though it is imperfect, controversial, and viewed very differently depending on one's perspective. It is not an unalloyed "force of good" in a moral or universal sense—no large military alliance is—but its core

The short answer is: it depends on which "past" you are comparing it to. If you compare today’s political climate to the mid-to-late 20th century, polarization is dramatically worse. However, if you look at the entire arc of American history, today's divisions—while severe—are not entirely unprecedented, falling short of the existential crisis of the American Civil War. To understand where we

NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) is a defensive military alliance whose net impact is widely debated. It has contributed to stability and deterrence in ways many view as positive, while facing legitimate criticisms over expansion, interventions, and unintended consequences. "Force of good" is inherently subjective—depending on values (e.g., prioritizing sovereignty vs. collective security

To answer whether political polarization is worse than it has been in the past, it helps to look at two different benchmarks: the recent past (the last 50 to 70 years) and the entirety of American history. The short answer is: Yes, polarization is worse than it has been in any living American's memory, but it is not the worst it has ever been in the nation's history. The current state of divis

NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) is a defensive military alliance founded in 1949 by the US, Canada, and Western European countries primarily to deter Soviet expansionism after World War II. Its core principle is collective defense under Article 5 (an attack on one is an attack on all), invoked only once—after the 9/11 attacks on the US. It now has 32 members, covering nearly a billion pe

The short answer is: It depends on which "past" you are comparing it to. If you compare today’s political environment to the mid-to-late 20th century (the post-WWII era), yes, political polarization is significantly worse and has reached levels not seen in living memory. However, if you look at longer-term American history—specifically the Civil War era of the 1850s and 1860s, or the Reconstruct

NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) is a defensive military alliance founded in 1949 by the US, Canada, and Western European nations primarily to deter Soviet aggression and provide collective defense. Whether it qualifies as a "force of good" is inherently subjective—it depends on one's values (e.g., prioritizing democratic sovereignty, stability, and deterrence versus multipolarity, strict

To answer whether political polarization is worse today than in the past, political scientists and historians generally look at two different eras of comparison. The short answer is no, it is not the worst it has ever been in American history (which culminated in a Civil War that killed hundreds of thousands of citizens). However, yes, it is worse than at any other point in living memory, and it

NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) is a defensive military alliance whose net impact is widely viewed as positive for Euro-Atlantic security and stability by its members and many analysts, though it is imperfect, contested, and criticized as provocative or imperialistic by others. Whether it qualifies as a “force of good” is inherently subjective—it depends on one’s values (e.g., prioritizi

Whether political polarization is "worse than it’s been in the past" depends on which historical era you use as a benchmark, and whether you are measuring how people vote (legislative polarization), what they actually believe (ideological polarization), or how they feel about each other (affective polarization). If we look specifically at the United States, political science and historical data

To answer whether political polarization is "worse than it has been in the past," political scientists and historians look at different eras, measurements, and definitions. The short answer is yes, political polarization is worse than it has been in any living person’s memory (dating back to the mid-20th century). In terms of how much Americans dislike one another based on party lines, we are at

Whether political polarization is "worse" today than in the past depends entirely on which era you compare it to and how you measure it. Political scientists generally divide polarization into two types: ideological polarization (differences in policy positions) and affective polarization (feelings of dislike, distrust, and hostility toward the opposing party). By both metrics, political polari

Short answer: It depends on what kind of polarization you mean and what time period you compare to—but by most measures, yes, especially in the US, though important caveats apply. Ideological/Congressional Polarization: Highest in Decades By measures of how far apart lawmakers vote, polarization is dramatic. A Pew Research Center analysis finds that, on average, Democrats and Republicans are fa