Responses

[[1]](https://news.gallup.com/poll/655298/biden-job-approval-second-lowest-among-post-wwii-presidents.aspx)[[2]](https://news.gallup.com/poll/654878/americans-think-history-rate-biden-presidency-negatively.aspx)[[3]](https://apnorc.org/projects/bidens-legacy-as-president/)[[4]](https://www.cfr.org/articles/bidens-legacy-major-accomplishments-unfinished-business)[[5]](https://www.newsweek.com/joe-b

[[1]](https://carnegieendowment.org/europe/strategic-europe/2024/04/at-75-nato-is-still-worth-the-price)[[2]](https://theweek.com/news/world-news/955953/the-pros-and-cons-of-nato)[[1]](https://carnegieendowment.org/europe/strategic-europe/2024/04/at-75-nato-is-still-worth-the-price)[[3]](https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/nato-enlargement-at-twenty-five/)[[4]](https://www.pewres

Yes, in key measurable ways—particularly reducing bureaucracy, cutting regulations, and restoring core functions like border enforcement—though with significant chaos, disputed savings claims, overstated metrics, short-term disruptions, and trade-offs that critics highlight as degradation. 1. [UNLINKED] [https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/2025/12/project-2025-year-review-trump/685395/](https

No, or yes—depending on one's priorities, values, and metrics—but the overall public and historical verdict so far leans negative, with significant achievements overshadowed by major shortcomings. "Good president" is inherently subjective. Evaluations differ sharply by party, ideology, and what one prioritizes (e.g., legislative output and alliances vs. inflation control, border security, and exec