Will stopping immigration cause labor shortages?
Stopping immigration would reshape the labor market — I'll pull the latest data on whether it would trigger shortages.
Yes, according to most recent economic and demographic research, stopping immigration would cause and worsen labor shortages - especially in the US, Canada, UK and other aging economies.
It would not create a one-for-one replacement of jobs for native-born workers.
1. Immigrants are now the main driver of labor force growth
Without that inflow, the underlying demographics point to shrinkage:
Two forces are currently shaping the U.S. labor market: an aging population, with larger cohorts reaching retirement, and the recent decline in net immigration, which together reduce labor force growth.
The median age in the United States increased from 32.9 in 1990 to 39.1 in 2024, shifting composition toward older workers with much lower participation rates. Canada is seeing the same pattern, with median age rising from 26 in 1971 to over 40 in 2026.
The Bank of Canada warns that slower population growth — caused by immigration cuts — plus an aging population could lead to labour shortages and higher inflation.
In the UK, the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) estimated such stagnation would leave GDP 3.6% smaller by 2040 than under official projections, because stopping migration shrinks the future workforce far more abruptly than it curtails corporate investment.
2. Recent slowdown already shows the effect
That explains why weak payroll numbers in 2025 (79,000 in July, 22,000 in August) did not necessarily mean weak labor demand - the labor supply itself shrank.
The effect is amplified by enforcement-related "chilling": In California, a surge in immigration worksite raids led to a 3.1% drop in the state's total workforce from May to June 2025, with noncitizen workforce participation falling by 7.2% in that same period.
3. Shortages are concentrated in sectors with chronic vacancies
Multiple federal and independent analyses find foreign-born workers concentrate in industries with persistent worker shortfalls like farming, construction, and long-term care.
Specific shares:
Recent National Foundation for American Policy (NFAP) research found:
> Recent NFAP research shows reducing immigrant labor worsens shortages, raises costs, and disproportionately affects Latino workers and essential services.
> When immigrant workers leave the workforce, native-born employees do not automatically fill those roles
> Industries such as healthcare, home care, and agriculture face intensified staffing gaps as immigration declines. NFAP senior fellow Mark Regets notes that “a severe drop in immigrant workers does not translate into more opportunities for U.S.-born employees—it creates real shortages that affect essential services.”
Immigration alleviates these shortages by helping fill vacancies and dampening wage growth during the high-immigration period of 2021-2024.
Without it, models predict project delays, higher wages to attract remaining workers, and higher consumer prices in construction and agriculture, where unauthorized workers make up about 19% of construction and nearly one quarter of farm labor nationally.
4. Does it help U.S.-born workers?
The stated goal of curbing immigration is often to protect native workers, but recent data does not support that trade-off:
Closing the labor supply also reduces consumer demand - immigrants are major contributors to both production and spending. Reduced immigration is estimated to weaken consumer spending by $60–$110 billion combined over 2025 and 2026, which dampens revenue for retail, restaurants and other sectors.
5. Nuance: Could shortages be avoided?
Bottom line: In aging economies with low birth rates, stopping immigration does not simply tighten the labor market - it shrinks it. The U.S. breakeven jobs number is now about half what it was two years ago because of demographics and immigration decline, and sectors that already face chronic vacancies (healthcare, agriculture, construction, hospitality, long-term care) would experience the most acute shortages, higher costs, and longer wait times.
Citations (3)
- Declining Immigration, Aging Population Reducing Breakeven Employment Growth
- Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
Backs: “It would not create a one-for-one replacement of jobs for native-born workers. 1. Immigrants are now the main driver of labor force growth”
- Structural Labor Supply Shock: The Macroeconomic Impact of a Shrinking Workforce
Backs: “working-age population would have started shrinking in 2012, not 2025. Without immigration, prime-age labor force growth will likely continue to slow and turn negative around 2042. Without immigration, the prime-age U.S.-born labor force was projected to grow at a rate that is 0.8 percentage point lower than earlier…”
- Immigration Labor Impact: NFAP Study Challenges Job Myths
Backs: “25.3% of workers in the agriculture industry overall and 54.3% of graders and sorters of agricultural products are immigrants, and one in four workers in construction were immigrants in 2022. Recent National Foundation for American Policy (NFAP) research found: Recent NFAP research shows reducing immigrant labor…”