What are the threats of today's political climate in the US?
Sources 8 and 11 describe political violence as at record or rising levels, while source 12 and 13 (Westwood) argue there is no mass movement of political violence and little public support for it.
Based on current analyses from democracy watchdogs, political scientists, and polling organizations, here's an overview of the major threats identified in today's U.S. political climate:
1. Erosion of Democratic Institutions and Rule of Law
Multiple democracy-monitoring organizations have flagged significant institutional decline. Comparing 2025 to 2020, the change in the quality of US democracy was entirely negative, with the country experiencing seven statistically significant declines across multiple measures of representative governance, civil liberties, and the rule of law, with no corresponding advances.
Watchdog groups point to specific pressures on checks and balances: pro-democracy state leaders who serve as a check on presidential power have faced politicized criminal investigations, stripped federal funding, and threats to their lives, while the president has attempted to reshape the judiciary by criticizing and threatening judges who rule against him.
2. Election Integrity Concerns Ahead of the Midterms
With the 2026 midterms approaching, several threats to the electoral process have been identified. The integrity of the November 2026 U.S. elections remains under threat, as the president has continued, without basis or evidence, to attack the integrity of elections and demanded solutions that do not respond to actual problems, potentially laying groundwork to question the election process and undermine public confidence.
Court rulings have also reshaped the electoral landscape: the Supreme Court has tilted the playing field for Republicans, including allowing Texas to adopt a district map intended to give Republicans five additional seats. There are also concerns about voter suppression — many eligible voters could face intimidation or other obstacles, including efforts to impose new, onerous voter identification requirements and limit mail-in voting.
3. AI-Driven Disinformation
Emerging technology poses a novel risk to democratic processes. If left unaddressed, AI and information manipulation pose an existential threat to elections and democracy itself. Specifically, using current AI technology, bad actors now have the power to spoof an entire county elections website and fill it with bad information, create false video of an elections official "caught on tape" saying that voting machines aren't secure, or generate a robocall in the president's voice telling millions of Americans their voting site has changed.
4. Rising Political Violence
Perhaps the most alarming trend is the escalation of political violence. Political violence is now at its highest level in the United States since the 1970s, with roughly 150 recorded politically motivated attacks in the first half of 2025—almost double from the same period in 2024. This violence has crossed the political spectrum, including right-wing extremists, left-wing militants, and unaffiliated actors.
Researchers note a key distinction in this new era: unlike in the 1960s and 1970s, when political polarization focused on specific issues like civil rights or the Vietnam War, the current environment is more nebulous, without a clear goal that both sides could work toward. Beyond mass violence, there's a broader pattern: threats against judges are up, hate crimes are at the highest recorded point in the twenty-first century, and mass shootings are spiking, with perpetrators adopting political rhetoric into their manifestos.
Interestingly, experts are divided on how widespread the appetite for violence actually is. One researcher wrote that a "mass movement of political violence is not happening," and tracking public support for political violence found that less than 2 percent of Americans believe political murder is acceptable. He argues "the core problem is not a widespread desire for violence, but a profound misperception of the other side."
5. Deep Affective Polarization
Even if actual violence remains limited to a minority, the perception of threat between parties is extraordinarily high. Recent polling found an 80-point partisan gap in Trump approval—the highest recorded in the modern polling era—and that 63% of Americans see the opposing party as a "threat to democracy," with affective polarization roughly doubling since 1994.
Other surveys show similarly stark numbers: 80% of partisans believe that the other party "poses a threat that if not stopped will destroy America as we know it," and 77% of voters believe that Americans who strongly support the other side are "a clear and present danger" to America.
This animosity has grown dramatically over time: 48% of Republicans placed their feelings about Democrats at 0 on a 100-point scale (76 times the share who did so in 2000), and 39% of Democrats reported their feelings about Republicans as 0 (43 times the share who did so in 2000).
Notably, researchers distinguish this from actual policy disagreement — issue polarization tells a different story, with 79% supporting Medicare drug negotiation and 76% supporting pre-existing conditions protections across party lines — suggesting Americans agree more on substance than the toxic rhetoric would imply.
6. Geographic and Social Sorting
Americans increasingly live in politically homogeneous "bubbles," reducing cross-partisan contact. The share of Americans in "landslide counties" grew from 39% (1992) to 57% (2024), limiting cross-partisan exposure. Researchers argue this sorting fuels misperception: much of the polarization that escalated in recent decades was largely driven by misperceptions people have about ordinary partisans on the other side—the everyday people in your neighborhood or office who happen to support the other party.
7. International Ripple Effects
Domestic instability isn't staying contained within U.S. borders. Since 2025, the US Government's threats and actions against other countries have undermined national sovereignty as well as international law and risked provoking more widespread violent conflict.
Bottom line: The most consistently cited threats are institutional erosion (judiciary, elections, checks on executive power), AI-fueled disinformation, rising political violence, and deep affective polarization — though experts note a gap between how much Americans say they distrust each other and actual support for violence, suggesting perception and rhetoric may be outpacing reality on some fronts.
Citations (18)
- The Global State of Democracy 2026: Democracy in an Age of Conflict | International IDEA
Source excerpt: “Comparing 2025 to 2020, the change in the quality of US democracy was entirely negative: the country experienced seven statistically significant decli...”
evidence, official document. Claim: Comparing 2025 to 2020, US democracy quality change was entirely negative, with seven statistically significant declines and no advances.
- The Threats to the Midterm Elections - States United Democracy Center
Source excerpt: “Pro-democracy state leaders who stand in the president’s way and serve as a check on his power have been attacked through politicized criminal investi...”
evidence, article. Claim: Pro-democracy state leaders checking presidential power faced politicized investigations, stripped funding, and threats; judges criticized and threatened.
- Threats to the 2026 Midterm Elections
Source excerpt: “Sadly, the integrity of the November 2026 U.S. elections remains under threat. President Trump has continued, without basis or evidence, to attack the...”
evidence, article. Claim: The president has attacked election integrity without evidence, threatening confidence in the November 2026 elections.
- Threats to the 2026 Midterm Elections
Source excerpt: “Already, the Supreme Court has tilted the playing field for the Republicans. Last December, in the case of Abbott v. League of United Latin American...”
evidence, article. Claim: The Supreme Court allowed Texas to adopt a map giving Republicans five additional seats.
- Threats to the 2026 Midterm Elections
Source excerpt: “Many eligible voters could face intimidation or other obstacles that could discourage or prevent them from voting in the 2026 midterm elections. Obsta...”
evidence, article. Claim: Voters could face intimidation, new voter ID requirements, and limits on mail-in voting.
- Democracy in 2026: What You Should Be Watching - Common Cause
Source excerpt: “If left unaddressed, AI and information manipulation pose an existential threat to elections and democracy itself. ”
evidence, article. Claim: Unaddressed AI and information manipulation pose an existential threat to elections and democracy.
- Democracy in 2026: What You Should Be Watching - Common Cause
Source excerpt: “In a few clicks, using current AI technology, bad actors now have the power to spoof an entire county elections website and fill it with bad informati...”
evidence, article. Claim: Bad actors can use AI to spoof election websites, fake videos of officials, and generate robocalls in the president's voice.
- Perceived Political Violence Risks Push Factions Toward Preemptive Retaliation, Researchers Warn
Source excerpt: “Political violence is now at its highest level in the United States since the 1970s. In the first half of 2025, there were roughly 150 recorded politi...”
statistic, article. Claim: Political violence is at its highest since the 1970s, with about 150 attacks in first half of 2025.
- Perceived Political Violence Risks Push Factions Toward Preemptive Retaliation, Researchers Warn
Source excerpt: “Threat actors have crossed the political spectrum, including right-wing extremists, left-wing militants, and unaffiliated actors, according to the Tod...”
evidence, article. Claim: Political violence threat actors span right-wing extremists, left-wing militants, and unaffiliated actors.
- Perceived Political Violence Risks Push Factions Toward Preemptive Retaliation, Researchers Warn
Source excerpt: “But unlike in the 1960s and 1970s, when political polarization focused on specific issues like civil rights or the Vietnam War, the current environmen...”
evidence, article. Claim: Unlike the 1960s-70s, current polarization is more nebulous without a clear goal both sides could work toward.
- Polarization, Democracy, and Political Violence in the United States: What the Research Says | Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Source excerpt: “Not only are American politicians ... more threats, but also, threats against judges are up, hate crimes are at the highest recorded point in the twen...”
evidence, article. Claim: Threats against judges are up, hate crimes are at a 21st-century high, and mass shootings are spiking.
- Perceived Political Violence Risks Push Factions Toward Preemptive Retaliation, Researchers Warn
Source excerpt: “In analysis published by POLITICO, Sean Westwood, director of the Polarization Research Lab and an associate professor at Dartmouth College, wrote tha...”
attribution, article. Claim: Researcher Sean Westwood wrote that a mass movement of political violence is not happening; under 2% accept political murder.
- Perceived Political Violence Risks Push Factions Toward Preemptive Retaliation, Researchers Warn
Source excerpt: ““The core problem is not a widespread desire for violence, but a profound misperception of the other side,” Westwood explained.”
attribution, article. Claim: Westwood argues the core problem is misperception of the other side, not widespread desire for violence.
- Political Polarization in 2026: How Divided Is America, Really?
Source excerpt: “80-point partisan gap in Trump approval (90% R / 8-10% D) — highest recorded in modern polling era; compares to 70pt for Obama, 60pt for Clinton · 63%...”
statistic, article. Claim: An 80-point partisan gap in Trump approval, and 63% see the opposing party as a threat to democracy.
- Toxic Polarization Data — Listen First Project
Source excerpt: “(Fox News) 80% of partisans believe that the other party “poses a threat that if not stopped will destroy America as we know it." (NBC News) 77% of vo...”
statistic, data page. Claim: 80% of partisans see the other party as a destructive threat; 77% of voters call the other side a clear and present danger.
- Toxic Polarization Data — Listen First Project
Source excerpt: “(Kalmoe and Mason) 48% of Republicans placed their feelings about Democrats at 0 on a 100-point scale (76x the share who did so in 2000) and 39% of De...”
statistic, data page. Claim: 48% of Republicans and 39% of Democrats rate the other party at 0 on a 100-point scale.
- The 'Great Divide': Understanding US Political Polarization | Syracuse University Today
Source excerpt: ““Much of the polarization that escalated in recent decades was largely driven by misperceptions people have about ordinary partisans on the other side...”
attribution, article. Claim: Researchers say polarization is largely driven by misperceptions about ordinary partisans on the other side.
- The Global State of Democracy 2026: Democracy in an Age of Conflict | International IDEA
Source excerpt: “Since 2025, the US Government’s threats and actions against other countries have undermined national sovereignty as well as international law and risk...”
evidence, official document. Claim: Since 2025, US threats and actions against other countries undermined sovereignty and international law and risked wider conflict.